Steam'i Yükleyin
giriş
|
dil
简体中文 (Basitleştirilmiş Çince)
繁體中文 (Geleneksel Çince)
日本語 (Japonca)
한국어 (Korece)
ไทย (Tayca)
Български (Bulgarca)
Čeština (Çekçe)
Dansk (Danca)
Deutsch (Almanca)
English (İngilizce)
Español - España (İspanyolca - İspanya)
Español - Latinoamérica (İspanyolca - Latin Amerika)
Ελληνικά (Yunanca)
Français (Fransızca)
Italiano (İtalyanca)
Bahasa Indonesia (Endonezce)
Magyar (Macarca)
Nederlands (Hollandaca)
Norsk (Norveççe)
Polski (Lehçe)
Português (Portekizce - Portekiz)
Português - Brasil (Portekizce - Brezilya)
Română (Rumence)
Русский (Rusça)
Suomi (Fince)
Svenska (İsveççe)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamca)
Українська (Ukraynaca)
Bir çeviri sorunu bildirin
Battlefield 1 is brawny. Battlefield V is effeminate.
Battlefield 1 had perfected TTK. Battlefield V's rate of fire and TTK balancing was not of the best quality.
The two things which really bothered me enough to say, "this one's not for me" was the Garand and an under emphasis on ironsights.
The overall historal accuracy issues led to an immersion problem. Copable, like with cinnamon or something added to it, but not the best taste when you want a good solid cup of coffee.
At least in BF1 you had a better chance of taking armored vehicles down.
What I have to read on this tread