This is awesome

[jason5103]

Why is there no sequel? did it not make enough money?

[magicISO Sweden]

apex did come

[ACCESS_DENIIED]

The release window for the game was poor.
They jammed it in-between COD and something else iirc so it never stood a chance at gaining traction.
Then they released Apex which obviously did very well. I think apex is trash tbh but i digress.
There are rumours in the wind about T3 though.

[koopinator14]

so far i heard some rumor about titanfall 3 just recently but i highly doubt it or it being like the original devs would have made since I last recall they left the company

[generic_sn]

All the big companies are trying to focus on making live service/F2P games because they see how much money companies like Valve makes with them. Titanfall never had the numbers to be as profitable as BF or COD.

The poster on top of me is also right.

[Albie There]

I think it's well deserved they got no money. The game is good, but I despise devs who offer such useless DLCs (that should be free for what they are) like useless skins which make no difference to the base game.

At least offer something like side missions, a new campaign...

[robo]

Originally posted by Dpog:

because titanfall 2 isnt that good and is overrated, it doesnt deserve a sequel and ea would find a way to ♥♥♥♥ it up

apex is 3 times better except for the movement

0/10 ragebait

[Massacher]

Originally posted by generic_sn:

All the big companies are trying to focus on making live service/F2P games because they see how much money companies like Valve makes with them. Titanfall never had the numbers to be as profitable as BF or COD.

The poster on top of me is also right.

Nah we don't care about those games. I WON'T EVER play those type of games. They are trash.

[generic_sn]

Originally posted by Massacher:

Originally posted by generic_sn:

All the big companies are trying to focus on making live service/F2P games because they see how much money companies like Valve makes with them. Titanfall never had the numbers to be as profitable as BF or COD.

The poster on top of me is also right.

Nah we don't care about those games. I WON'T EVER play those type of games. They are trash.

There will only be live service games and YOU will like them!

[Massacher]

Originally posted by generic_sn:

Originally posted by Massacher:

Nah we don't care about those games. I WON'T EVER play those type of games. They are trash.

There is only going to be live service games and YOU will like them!

lol I have over 200 games on my backlog. I'll be fine.

[Suchinessa]

too fast for gamepad degenerates

[Massacher]

Originally posted by Suchinessa:

too fast for gamepad degenerates

What has that got to do with anything? Gamers can play with whatever control device they please, especially on PC.

[armtriangle]

friend told me it partially has to do with money. apex made 10x the money of tf2

[Massacher]

Originally posted by armtriangle:

friend told me it partially has to do with money. apex made 10x the money of tf2

Apex is trash though. Its just another clone. Not worthy of my time.

[arsenicClawcat]

Originally posted by ACCESS_DENIIED:

The release window for the game was poor.
They jammed it in-between COD and something else iirc so it never stood a chance at gaining traction.
Then they released Apex which obviously did very well. I think apex is trash tbh but i digress.
There are rumours in the wind about T3 though.

cod and doom ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ 4 ("doom 2016" if youre a normie)

[arsenicClawcat]

Originally posted by Suchinessa:

too fast for gamepad degenerates

demonstrably false a lot of people actually play on pad