Steam telepítése
belépés
|
nyelv
简体中文 (egyszerűsített kínai)
繁體中文 (hagyományos kínai)
日本語 (japán)
한국어 (koreai)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bolgár)
Čeština (cseh)
Dansk (dán)
Deutsch (német)
English (angol)
Español - España (spanyolországi spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (latin-amerikai spanyol)
Ελληνικά (görög)
Français (francia)
Italiano (olasz)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonéz)
Nederlands (holland)
Norsk (norvég)
Polski (lengyel)
Português (portugáliai portugál)
Português - Brasil (brazíliai portugál)
Română (román)
Русский (orosz)
Suomi (finn)
Svenska (svéd)
Türkçe (török)
Tiếng Việt (vietnámi)
Українська (ukrán)
Fordítási probléma jelentése
Also you must be either young or fairly new to competitive gaming, because it was clearly not aight crushing people a decade ago. And I was the zoomer trying to be better than most people.
Casuals dont bother, they just turn up cod to play with a few friends after work, it's the majority of players and always will be, which is a good thing.
Congratulations, I had that mentality when I was a teenager. If adults keep having this mindset, my condolences.
No idea how old you are, back about 10 years ago, people have been playing for fun and didn't follow a streamer or any guide for the best combination possible, because it was only a videogame.
Yeah you had your noob tube in MW2 or several akimbo setups but people clearly didnt abuse it to death.
If you were a good player in the first place, you'd come to this conclusion aswell and I'm not talking about the metaslaves exclusively, but the issue around matchmaking in general.
Siege is actually the only game I've spent roughly 50 hours into and I can agree that I wasn't willing to invest a lot of time into learning the maps. I dont how am I complaining a lot when infact this is the only thread you've seen me so far.
About competitive games not being my thing anymore is probably right. But people make it up like I'm bad in FPS games, when in reality I've accomplished my own goals I've made for these games and I see no reason to go beyond the highest skill group in these games? What would that be? ESEA? FACEIT?
I'd go into depth but you sound like you made up your mind already, so in short: there's always going to be someone that can stomp you, they most likely aren't cheating, as ive played this for years and have seen maybe a handful of cheaters max, and this game isn't competitive, nor is it an RPG with thousands of custom builds, so yes you will see some of the same weapons, tacticals and titans. I suggest you stick with it and get better.
Most likely aren't cheating? Probably, but free weekends make it easy and my experience was getting killed by blatant aimbotters, nah it's not normal if that person is turning 90 to 180 degrees without moving the mouse popping heads like an everyday job. Must be legitimate and normal I guess nowadays lmao. I'm outta here, copiumlevels are getting unreal.
That you bro?
https://steamcommunity.com/app/8500/discussions/0/3108014879953766945/?ctp=2#c3104638636529094962
Nevermind you're just a toxic PoS.
Yes, I'm sure the opinion of a moron who can't deal with "ganks" in FH is relevant lmao. You are the one who won't be missed.
Honestly, with this sudden revival of the game with ~30k players, things became only worse.
I remember playing when it was around 3-5k players and things were more or less fine and balanced.
Now every single match is one-sided trash. Either our team gets totaly destroyed (for example, just had a bounty hunt match, where our team was able to get around 100$ in total), or the opposite. It really sucks. Even if this game has some sort of balance, it doesn't work at all. Don't even tell me, that from 30k players, the game isn't able to find 10-12 players with the same skill level.
Why are you talking like a ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ 50 year old man,while you're only 26... Did you even check out my profile? Fairly new to comp games? My ass lol.And it was always about crushing/a.k.a. winning, it is either win or lose.Don't deceive yourself. Even the casuals have the spirit for winning.It was same about 10 years ago and it still goes on.Everyone expects to win and feel good.And hitting some ranks at certain games doesn't mean sh*t.I was a gm ow player, even at gm there were people who were playing like a sh*t.And you're whining after reaching a certain place? Adept and overcome if you can't don't ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ whine about it.
I've played a minor amount of Counter-Strike 1.6 scrims and a lot of pub servers 10 years ago - there was virtually no difference in the two besides player amount, because everyone still used comp league tactics for certain maps and tried VERY hard to win. This could be a regional thing, however, since the country where i'm from, people are 90% more likely to take most games super seriously, even if it's a casual server.
You're right about this. I personally think people who play exclusively with only a single meta loadout and nothing else despite hundreds of hours sunk into the game, are lame one-trick ponies who clearly haven't bothered using their skills to hone their abilities with other weapons.
Well, i don't disagree with you that games need some sort of matchmaking system to keep the more hardcore, experienced players away from casuals, but it'd damn well better be a good one, otherwise we'll have another Call of Duty "#RemoveSBMM" situation on our hands again.
OTPs are a serious issue compared to 10 years ago - granted in CS 1.6 or my game used to be Source, you had AWP/AK/M4/DEAGLE, with an exception of MP5/USP/GLOCK in whatever rounds you call them. Sure, you can be an AWP OTP, but this is completely different to for example "maining" a character in Apex with the same 1-2 weapons all game. (f. e. EVA-8 and R-99/R-301)
I'm glad you didn't take this part personally, because I clearly don't know if you're good in FPS or not, I should have written this one more carefully, I didn't want to attack you there.
Personally I am very conflicted with SBMM/PBMM (COD has Performance Based Match Making I believe) and I think this is a good think in rankeds obviously. However, in casual matches (especially in COD) I do not wish for such a system. A LOT of people play this game and whenever I play Call of Duty, I don't think about tryharding so bad.
In MW2/MW3/BO2/BO3 I used to play with music sometimes, I had different "builds" and weapons, like what attachments are good, or good for me personally, because i played the game differently. (I was rushing more than camping, which you can clearly tell from the screenshots I have uploaded) These matches weren't painfully one-sided or anything, it was just people messing around, sometimes insulted each other and shaking hands at the end. IN COD2019 I have to sweat my BUTT off to get a 2.0 K/D and it gets even worse. M4/MP5/7 meta (when I played) dominated everything else and the constant need to trying my hardest was just exhausting. I have to wait up to a minute for a "proper match", when it used to be 3 seconds, just to try so bad and I don't even care about winning or losing, but about my own performance.
I do not think that SB-/PBMM belongs into Call of Duty, but I understand the reasoning behind it.
I've played more BO: Cold War than 2019, but i can tell you, some matches on release week felt like absolute hell to play, and at one point, i thought it was worse than MW2019. It seems like PBMM has toned down a little bit (my KD fluctuates around 1.42-1.5) but i still get the occasional hell game, and if i start getting many in a row, i just stop and go play something less frustrating.
BO2 had SBMM/PBMM to a certain extent but it only affected a small number of players and it was very light, too. When i play on the 360 on occasion and i'm not getting hacked lobbies, it always seems to be a mix of 4 average players and 2 players who are insanely good (usually, unfortunately, they only use the AN-94 and SCAR-H, but i've seen a handful with the SMR/FAL/SWAT-556).
I'm very average, but my skill fluctuates too. Some matches i'm "popping off" and gathering a lot of kills, some matches it feels like my hand either tries to track too hard and i miss my target or it locks up while i'm shooting someone and i can't compensate for recoil/flick/track.
It's something that has been lessening the more i play Q3A, though.
hopefully arenas fixes this and offers a more competitive experience free from rng.
BO:CW was the first COD I did not purchase on day 1 and still didn't. I played the beta, first match was a blast and the next matched I was almost getting blasted and had to sweat hard again and decided to just let it be. If you have fun at playing the game overall, go ahead, the game is supposed to be fun.
I wouldn't say you're really average, since if you claim to be around 1.42-1.5, this is actually above average, but not exorbitant insane. You can't really measure it anyways because you have this kind of matchmaking, you don't know if you're good or everyone has gotten improved and it is kind of obvious to figure that out if you need up to 30 seconds to find a "suitable" match, although MILLIONS are playing the game.
or a non team mode. i dont know why every FPS game has to be team based, is it to teach us to work well collaboratively in out slave jobs or to crush individuality? who knows maybe ive smoked to much herbal tea