Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2484945764
Usually there is a balancing act between the economy and the budget, you have to sacrifice one to improve the other, but a debt crisis is just bad all around. My response then was to pass all the consumption tax bills later in the game to get the budget back to normal, but that also hurt the economy and probably cancelled out the gains I was getting from earlier investments. Which is why it stayed bad.
You didn't mention regional investments, I think overall you do want to see the local economies improve as well. And there is at least one area of the government for which increase funding gets you your money back and then some, if you don't know already. Also, if you're going with Underhall, you might not want to pass the Workers Rights Bill, I think it affects them more than the other options.