Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I never pass on infrastructure since it's usually always popular (Clinton is a recent perfect example of this) and has the capability of generating economic return. I slash tax rates for all corporations because you would hope it leads to increased employment (through reinvestment and new investment of capital). I always engage in trade deals since we know the economic principle of comparative advantage. The one country that wants to renegotiate the trade deal is even a good deal because losing them as a trading partner should be much worse than losing a little bit in the deal (I haven't chosen the option where the deal falls apart because it seems to be a no-brainer to me). This should also stimulate economic growth since you are getting better prices for certain industries in your economy.
Also, you can leverage the excess oil you get from the southwest country to bolster your deal with the south country (forget names)
(on the other hand not being in debt can too generate some extra opportunities every now and then)
So your threshold is -3 early on. Late game you can dip into -6/7 without too many issues.
Maintaining seems to have negative consequences.