Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Add in the fact that even though the class description says "uses int for spellcasting," and the development team REPEATEDLY had class features working based on wisdom instead, and there's a whole lot of reasons not to do it.
If you want to be a super skillful character who can enhance the party, and hit hard, just play a bard.
Also, not sure why you're taking unarmed strike if you want to fight with a light mace for the entire campaign.
unarmed strike is from background and i need it for crane style what is still a pretty potent feat, even if you dont go for crane wing, i could but better to use a good shield i think, shield spell is only 4 AC, a good shield with shield wall will be more usefull i think and cost less feats....
well, bard is a fine class but i just wanted to play a divine caster and i somehow like the living grimore a lot, it is just something special compared to clerics or warpriests, guess i'll just try to make the most out of it (: