安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語（日文）
한국어（韓文）
ไทย（泰文）
Български（保加利亞文）
Čeština（捷克文）
Dansk（丹麥文）
Deutsch（德文）
English（英文）
Español - España（西班牙文 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希臘文）
Français（法文）
Italiano（義大利文）
Bahasa Indonesia（印尼語）
Magyar（匈牙利文）
Nederlands（荷蘭文）
Norsk（挪威文）
Polski（波蘭文）
Português（葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙）
Português - Brasil（葡萄牙文 - 巴西）
Română（羅馬尼亞文）
Русский（俄文）
Suomi（芬蘭文）
Svenska（瑞典文）
Türkçe（土耳其文）
tiếng Việt（越南文）
Українська（烏克蘭文）
回報翻譯問題
討論區規矩與守則
檢舉此篇文章
Because to execute traitors and weaklings (whom willingly come to fight evil!) is not a Evil act.
Therefore, if a character behaves in a Lawful Good fashion and always chooses lawful good options whenever possible his/her alignment will eventually become Neutral Good. S/he needs to occasionally skip the lawful good choices and take lawful evil options instead, in order to stay Lawful Good.
Don't forget - LG char WILL execute criminals and cultists. If you're trying to find a mercy for everyone - that isn't a Lawful but Neutral Good.
It's so fun to see how many players forget that paladin is a holy knight, is a crusader in war against evil so Duty is comes first to him while mercy is reserved only for whom deserved it.
If you're trying to save everyone and eager to pick options limiting Fifth Crusade combat ability or wasting it's resources on non-combat related demands - you are not paladin.
Camellia, once you find out that she is actually just a psycho murderer
you don't even get the option to lock her up, like you should.
Lol, no. You're at WAR, not at school brawl!
It's more then enough to know they're fighting against you with weapons in their hands.
And note, not all of those decisions even have them fighting you first.
I am aware that Laeful good doesn't mean lawful nice, but the lawful decisions in WOTR seem either condescending or more shifted towards lawful evil characters, rather than lawful good ones.
And although they were rare, Kingmaker atr least sometimes had those middle ground decisions where there were actual LG,LN,LE decisions.
For example - execution of deserters is a common thing. Same for being caught with banned weapon. Or I can remind you about Cathar heresy and crusade against it :)
Probably because we're in a middle of WAR? That isn't a suitable place to care about poor and struggling.
Which is a completely fine and understandable perspective, it just isn't lawful as defined by Pathfinder so it is not surprising that you constantly find yourself dissatisfied with lawful choices. Given that discrepancy, picking the game's only class with a lawful good alignment requirement may not be the best choice for you.
Sure, you could manage the situation by constantly buying atonement scrolls or just resetting your alignment with cheats whenever you drift away from LG, but what's the point of doing that when you can just switch to a different class that allows alignments more in-sync with how you'd like your character to behave? Faith hunter inquisitor comes to mind as an archetype that's broadly similar to paladin yet would allow you to be neutral good, and other archetypes like deliverer slayer, crusader cleric or purifier oracle have enough thematic similarities to paladin that they might be worth considering as well.
My point is that it wasn't nearly as bad in Kingmaker, as Kingmaker had actual choices marked as the full alignment, rather than just NEutral-Something.
I'm not even trying to save everyone, Wenduag for example clearly had to die. Camellia too, due to absence of an option to lock her up (although that one wasn't even marked as lawful)
Some of the Lawful choices towards Seelah for example, are nothing but blame-shifting, and totally uncalled for, even by Pathfinder's definition.
1. [Lawful] I won't lift a finger to help you, slave. Slavery is legal among your people and your master has every right to beat you like he just did.
2. [Good] You poor thing. Don't worry, I will buy you from your master and set you free.
Here the good option is also perfectly consistent with the law, so a lawful good person would always pick that one. It doesn't contradict with any of his ideals. Whereas the lawful options are very often lawful at the expense of good -- so that a lawful good character will have to compromise being good if he wants to stay lawful.
Actually Paladin should always pick 1st option. You're on mission to save whole country and not to waste time (and money) on useless charity.
Paladin is not a Hero-Save-them-All, he's more like special ops officer.
Yes, Lawful Good. They tried to save souls from heresy via passing laws - it's a pure LG act (yes, I realise that probaly some nobles&church leaders had more sinister plans but for common crusaders they'd done LG act).
Also yea I agree, the [lawful] don't look like good choices, but fair is fair, they don't say it's LG neceserrily. Some are, some aren't. Choose what fits.