Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Keldorn was flawed in their own right, with his negligence towards his family. So I don't see why you would call one a Paladin and the other not. Seelah is more care-free but that doesn't mean she is any less of a Paladin.
Also, Regill is the best. Just wanted to add that here.
Seelah is the iconic pathfinder paladin, written by paizo. She is supposed to be the character example for the paladin class in the setting.
Paladins in pathfinder don't work the same as in D&D. From a pathfinder standpoint, Seelah is fine.
She doesn't act like a fundamentalist Southern Baptist paladin.
Seelah has a character that is more than just being a Paladin. Being LG doesn't mean you can't have a beer every now and then.
It's called a story arc. It's a narrative tool used by people who want to write actual people and not generic archetypes that have been beaten to death. She was a thief. She changed her life, and if you save all her stupid friends and stuff she has a happy ending.
Yes, yes, God forbid one of your characters not enter the story with doubts and questions like an actual human being, rather than being the physical embodiment of law and order and free from spiritual questions.