Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Games usually don't use RAI rules, which is why it is somewhat weird to me. I feel like they just programmed it the way you said - weapon in 2 hands? Good bonk. 1 Hand? Bad Bonk. And Titan Fighter is an exception, so it would make sense.
Dunno what's there is not clear.
"If going alone, or going together with a friend" does not mean you are also alone while with somebody else. If you want more examples - "If you use an evocation spell, or a spell that deals elemental damage", "If you side with Person A, or side with Person B whom you completed quest C for".
Basically the way it is worded it can either imply that you are using thing A or thing B + condition C, or that you use thing A or B, both with condition C.
Furthermore Titan Fighters are meant to be able to use 2-handed things with 1 hand, why wouldn't that include feats?
The problem is the wording for Focused Strike assumes a two handed weapon HAS to be used with two hands. And Owlcat probably did the programming to make it so that it doesn't work if the weapon isn't used in two hands, to prevent used a sword and shield. Then along comes Titan Fighter which breaks the rule requiring a two handed weapon to be used with two hands.
The ability (which ISN'T worded the same way the ability is worded in tabletop) was obviously intended to only work when a weapon is used in two hands. I would say it is working as intended by Owlcat.
The comma shouldn't have been there in the first place.