I want this game using PF2e Ruleset.

[Mauseleum]

Dear God this game would be perfect and I could die happy.

The music, story and voice acting in this game will keep me happy atleast 50 years to come <0.0>

Oh, and remove act 4 map jiggling while converting the rulesystem. >.>

Dont mind me. I just needed to get this outta my system.

[Soul]

Publicado originalmente por Mauman:

Publicado originalmente por Shadow of Anthares:

I....Actually agree with this one.
Not in such harsh words, but... Yeah.

DnD 5e and PF 2e are not exactly what I want to see in tabletop and in videogames.

To be fair, I was being nice. Relatively.

If I said what I want to say whenever someone brings up PF2, I'd probably be banned :P

to be fair.... I think it pretty much mainly has to deal with what people were probably introduced to dnd with.....

for myself I got into dnd with 3.5 edition..... and baldurs gate 3 feels.... weird.... with its 5th edition rules and gameplay....

i'd imagine though if I had started off getting into dnd 5th edition.... that playing this game which utilizes dnd 3.5 edition rules.... i'd probably be overwhelmed by the change to the rules....

now what WOULD be cool.... though right now an impossibility i'd imagine..... is if there was a way to add a feature to these games to allow you to choose which ruleset you want to play with... like a one time choice at game start to use say 3.5 or 5th edition ruleset....

[Mr Fred]

Dont worry OP more and more games will get more and more streamlined, this is where the $$$ is and the bleak future of gaming.

[Vertigo]

Publicado originalmente por Mr Fred:

Dont worry OP more and more games will get more and more streamlined, this is where the $$$ is and the bleak future of gaming.

Not all streamlining is bad, but there is nothing stopping people from sticking with older systems.

That said, if people want to see these more intricate systems survive, then one would think said community would want to welcome new players and not drive them off...

[Locke]

Publicado originalmente por Mauman:

Publicado originalmente por Shadow of Anthares:

I....Actually agree with this one.
Not in such harsh words, but... Yeah.

DnD 5e and PF 2e are not exactly what I want to see in tabletop and in videogames.

To be fair, I was being nice. Relatively.

If I said what I want to say whenever someone brings up PF2, I'd probably be banned :P

You strike me as someone who would be fun to hang out with. I bet you get invited to parties a lot.

[Mauman]

Publicado originalmente por Locke:

Publicado originalmente por Mauman:

To be fair, I was being nice. Relatively.

If I said what I want to say whenever someone brings up PF2, I'd probably be banned :P

You strike me as someone who would be fun to hang out with. I bet you get invited to parties a lot.

And you strike me as someone who doesn't eat lead paint chips. I bet you're not a brain dead fool ;)

[Shadow of Anthares]

Publicado originalmente por Mauman:

Publicado originalmente por Locke:

You strike me as someone who would be fun to hang out with. I bet you get invited to parties a lot.

And you strike me as someone who doesn't eat lead paint chips. I bet you're not a brain dead fool ;)

Exchanging of strikes? Is that a duel? :)))

[TaKo]

have you tried behaving like a normal person

anyways

while i have no experience with 2e most of what ive read on it seems good and would be interested in seeing someone tackle it in crpg format

[Shadow of Anthares]

Publicado originalmente por TaKo:

have you tried behaving like a normal person

anyways

while i have no experience with 2e most of what ive read on it seems good and would be interested in seeing someone tackle it in crpg format

Biggest problem with 2e is that it supposed to REPLACE first edition, not to be an equal addition.

Once same concept applied for dnd 4e as well. In response we got Pathfinder 1 edition. And now we see this exact same situation again - with pathfinder series.

[TaKo]

Publicado originalmente por Shadow of Anthares:

Biggest problem with 2e is that it supposed to REPLACE first edition, not to be an equal addition.

its a new edition not an addition, what did you expect, its not a problem its a feature, what

you are free to continue using 1e systems if you prefer but you'll have to adapt new stuff into it

[Drake]

Yeah it's not there to replace anything. You can still play the 1e with the old setting if you want. You just can't play the new adventures and PFS with it.

That said, while I could get that some people would feel underwhelmed by the first release of P2E, with all the new content that got added, there is a lot of room to build your char. It's nowhere near the railroad trash that is dnd 5E.
I think people are way to hard on paizo.

[Vertigo]

Publicado originalmente por Drake:

Yeah it's not there to replace anything. You can still play the 1e with the old setting if you want. You just can't play the new adventures and PFS with it.

That said, while I could get that some people would feel underwhelmed by the first release of P2E, with all the new content that got added, there is a lot of room to build your char. It's nowhere near the railroad trash that is dnd 5E.
I think people are way to hard on paizo.

Agreed. There are a lot of viable build options and ways to make every character have some degree of variety. It is certainly better than 5e and 4e. I think some on here simply want to hate on it because it's different and not making Urist McMunchkin with his 3 level dips due to frontloaded classes. 2e still allows you to make some powerful characters.

[AzureTheGamerKobold]

You couldn't at present do PF2e for WOTR anyway, because there are no mythic rules last time i checked. I know its in the pipleline... but still not quite there. Honestly i'd be shocked if they didn't release a redux of WOTR--- BUT with that said...

I personally prefer PF1e, and while i DO play PF2e in my current campaign with some friends. It didn't really WoW me. i know my Players like how quickly you can make characters via pathbuilder, but outside of that? it doesn't do anything better then PF1e and in fact seems to just nerf everything into the ground. its trying SO hard to be 5e... or some place between 5e and older editions that i just don't think it has a unique identity anymore.

Its a good system and i'm happy to see folks even talking about it and not 5e... but i think WOTR is fine as it is. I would not be shocked in Owlcat came back with a PF2e game based on one of the other AP's though.

[TaKo]

Publicado originalmente por AzureTheGamerKobold:

You couldn't at present do PF2e for WOTR anyway, because there are no mythic rules last time i checked.

this game doesnt really use the tabletop mythic rules tho, just kinda borrow some of the stuff from the materials and homebrew them wildly