I want this game using PF2e Ruleset.

[Mauseleum]

Dear God this game would be perfect and I could die happy.

The music, story and voice acting in this game will keep me happy atleast 50 years to come <0.0>

Oh, and remove act 4 map jiggling while converting the rulesystem. >.>

Dont mind me. I just needed to get this outta my system.

[reidj062]

Get the tabletop game and some friends, then. You're not going to find a mod for that.

[Vertigo]

It would require an entire overhaul of the system considering 2e has a different action economy (not to mention class re-balances).

[Mauman]

And I want PF2 to go die in a hole and not exist anymore.

[Shadow of Anthares]

Originally posted by Mauman:

And I want PF2 to go die in a hole and not exist anymore.

I....Actually agree with this one.
Not in such harsh words, but... Yeah.

DnD 5e and PF 2e are not exactly what I want to see in tabletop and in videogames.

[Drake]

I get DnD5E but PF2 has some good stuff in it. I wouldn't lump it in the same bag. It's still a very solid ruleset that has some complexity (you actually have build choices at level up, not like dnd5).

That said, my favourite one will still be starfinder. And I hope after rogue trader, owlcat seriously considers a starfinder game since SF1e is now finished and won't get anymore updates after may 2024 (scoured stars would be the most logical adventure, unless the new mechaggedon is crazy good, because mechs are awesome).

[Cutlass Jack]

Originally posted by Shadow of Anthares:

DnD 5e and PF 2e are not exactly what I want to see in tabletop and in videogames.

This. Throw them both in the hole 4e is in.

[dszombiex]

Originally posted by Cutlass Jack:

Originally posted by Shadow of Anthares:

DnD 5e and PF 2e are not exactly what I want to see in tabletop and in videogames.

This. Throw them both in the whole 4e is in.

I'm with you. That being said I think people that like PF2e should have a game they can play. But we're all in a small minority if we're not playing what's popular so we have to wait for the odd company that also likes this "arcane" stuff.

[=M$= Oroberus]

Originally posted by reidj062:

Get the tabletop game and some friends, then. You're not going to find a mod for that.

You're answering someone that's using an animated kawai-girl avatar for their profile picture ... they have no friends ... and yes, I'm using a Sephiroth picture for my profile, I'm an expert in this regard

[Drake]

Originally posted by =M$= Oroberus:

Originally posted by reidj062:

Get the tabletop game and some friends, then. You're not going to find a mod for that.

You're answering someone that's using an animated kawai-girl avatar for their profile picture ... they have no friends ... and yes, I'm using a Sephiroth picture for my profile, I'm an expert in this regard

With how good foundryvtt is for PF2e, there is no issue finding people online and playing with them.
It's not the 90' anymore, tabletop is no harder to play than online games.

[makisekurisufcker]

Originally posted by =M$= Oroberus:

Originally posted by reidj062:

Get the tabletop game and some friends, then. You're not going to find a mod for that.

You're answering someone that's using an animated kawai-girl avatar for their profile picture ... they have no friends ... and yes, I'm using a Sephiroth picture for my profile, I'm an expert in this regard

Anime pfp. Opinion discarded.

[EQFL_Sapare]

Originally posted by Mauman:

And I want PF2 to go die in a hole and not exist anymore.

truth. I got into Pathfinder late, and was poor when i did, now that I have money I want a core rulebook so badly, but paizo wont print them, all you get in local stores is pf2 also..(i know ebay but it wont be in mint condition)

[hilburnashua]

Pathfinder 2nd edition certainly has some problems and some things that I find questionable, like the drastic reduction in power with spells and not gaining all your racial abilties at first level.

Having said that, I really enjoyed the 3 action economy system and the reduction in combat and skill modifiers.

[Vertigo]

Originally posted by hilburnashua:

Pathfinder 2nd edition certainly has some problems and some things that I find questionable, like the drastic reduction in power with spells and not gaining all your racial abilties at first level.

Having said that, I really enjoyed the 3 action economy system and the reduction in combat and skill modifiers.

I am in an 8 person campaign that has a mix of RP and combat. I do kinda like how streamlined some things are with the action economy. At the same time, I do miss some of the numbers crunch. 2E is certainly better than 5e, but it isn't as terrible as some people make it out to be.

Part of me wonders if some complaining are just upset they cannot have there class with 3 dips just to have huge numbers at level 3. It can be fun, but sometimes it's nice being able to make a character without needing 3 different source books to make someone that will be optimal in combat (and this is coming from someone who played a lot of 3.5).

[Mauman]

Originally posted by Shadow of Anthares:

Originally posted by Mauman:

And I want PF2 to go die in a hole and not exist anymore.

I....Actually agree with this one.
Not in such harsh words, but... Yeah.

DnD 5e and PF 2e are not exactly what I want to see in tabletop and in videogames.

To be fair, I was being nice. Relatively.

If I said what I want to say whenever someone brings up PF2, I'd probably be banned :P

[Shadow of Anthares]

Originally posted by Mauman:

Originally posted by Shadow of Anthares:

I....Actually agree with this one.
Not in such harsh words, but... Yeah.

DnD 5e and PF 2e are not exactly what I want to see in tabletop and in videogames.

To be fair, I was being nice. Relatively.

If I said what I want to say whenever someone brings up PF2, I'd probably be banned :P

That's how I was banned in BG3 forums more than once, so I know how it feels :))