Pathfinder: Wrath of the Righteous - Enhanced Edition

Pathfinder: Wrath of the Righteous - Enhanced Edition

View Stats:
Is there multiplayer?
I'm having trouble figuring out if this game has multiplayer options or not.
< >
Showing 1-13 of 13 comments
Schlumpsha Mar 27, 2023 @ 1:39am 
Singleplayer only. Not even couch coop.
☆AkaAkoVT☆ Mar 27, 2023 @ 1:40am 
Darn, that's really a shame
ajfusch Mar 27, 2023 @ 5:46am 
Multiplayer makes all but a single player sidekicks, with the one player being the chosen one. Who wants that? That's a good reason for there being no multiplayer at all.
I'm sure BG 1 didn't have multiplayer, either, BG 2 might have had it ... can't remember. Still, same thing.
That's why Icewind Dale had Multiplayer - there wasn't a "chosen one" storyline, all chars were equal.
Last edited by ajfusch; Mar 27, 2023 @ 5:48am
Cutlass Jack Mar 27, 2023 @ 6:20am 
Originally posted by ajfusch:
Multiplayer makes all but a single player sidekicks, with the one player being the chosen one. Who wants that? That's a good reason for there being no multiplayer at all.
I'm sure BG 1 didn't have multiplayer, either, BG 2 might have had it ... can't remember. Still, same thing.
That's why Icewind Dale had Multiplayer - there wasn't a "chosen one" storyline, all chars were equal.

Both BG 1 & 2 had multiplayer. But it was like you thought. One player was the chosen one.

The main way many used the multiplayer option in both games was as a trick to get extra created companions in your party. You ran multiple copies of the game to make the extra character, then when that second player 'left' you could control both characters.
Last edited by Cutlass Jack; Mar 27, 2023 @ 6:38am
Lywelyn Mar 27, 2023 @ 6:42am 
Originally posted by Babbles:
Yeah dude, I mean Baldurs Gate One had multiplayer, pity the fact this game was made by Russians, who don't get along with ANYONE.

So no, no multiplayer.

Go play BG2 with some steam friends, not this rubbish.

discrimination has no place among us.

if you have anything constructive to say by all means speak, otherwise please keep your sorry opinion for yourself.



Originally posted by ☆Hello, I am friend cat!☆:
I'm having trouble figuring out if this game has multiplayer options or not.

there is no multiplayer in pathfinder, the genre used to have it, such as neverwinter nights, but nowadays game's ressource and needs sadly require a lot of investment that can not be spared for that.

although that is not really a problem considering the huge content and replayability of the pathfinder games. hope you'll enjoy it nontheless !
Dungeon Crawler May 16, 2023 @ 4:56pm 
ya wtf, baldurs gate is awesome cause of multiplayer. Had the best gaming exerpience of my life playing the campaigns co op through the enhanced version.
dbvel Mar 25, 2024 @ 10:33pm 
Not to mention bg 3 multiplayer
Immortal Reaver Mar 26, 2024 @ 11:02am 
Originally posted by Dungeon Crawler:
ya wtf, baldurs gate is awesome cause of multiplayer.
No it would be awesome even if it did not have multiplayer.

Originally posted by dbvel:
Not to mention bg 3 multiplayer
Yeah and because of it, singleplayer-only experience suffers for it.
dbvel Mar 26, 2024 @ 11:23am 
Originally posted by Immortal Reaver:
Originally posted by dbvel:
Not to mention bg 3 multiplayer
Yeah and because of it, singleplayer-only experience suffers for it.

definitely not. bg3 sp is also great.
Immortal Reaver Mar 26, 2024 @ 11:50am 
Originally posted by dbvel:
Originally posted by Immortal Reaver:

Yeah and because of it, singleplayer-only experience suffers for it.

definitely not. bg3 sp is also great.
I played Evil playthrough first and it was lacking content and buggy. So I do not share the opinion as my first impression was tainted. Especialy because of game breaking bugs in Act 3, which became so annyoing I ended the playthrough.
Yeah and singleplayer experience is suffering for multiplayer. Inventory is pain in the ass with so many items and you don't have global inventory, and when being on companion and forgeting to switch back to MC, NPCs act like it is first time they met me. There are other problems too, but they are not directly linked to multiplayer.
Last edited by Immortal Reaver; Mar 26, 2024 @ 11:51am
dbvel Mar 26, 2024 @ 1:44pm 
Originally posted by Immortal Reaver:
Originally posted by dbvel:

definitely not. bg3 sp is also great.
I played Evil playthrough first and it was lacking content and buggy. So I do not share the opinion as my first impression was tainted. Especialy because of game breaking bugs in Act 3, which became so annyoing I ended the playthrough.
Yeah and singleplayer experience is suffering for multiplayer. Inventory is pain in the ass with so many items and you don't have global inventory, and when being on companion and forgeting to switch back to MC, NPCs act like it is first time they met me. There are other problems too, but they are not directly linked to multiplayer.


I agree bg3 is buggy as hell, I've met almost-game-breaking bugs many times. NPCs and companions do forget things and lack continuity many times. That being said, I can't understand how can someone feel like there's not enough content, since there are so many memorable npcs and hours of so many fun (side) quests and dialogues etc... dozens of hours literally. But well, we're way off topic, I'll stop here. I still have to play pathfinder wotr, I've only played kingmaker.
Immortal Reaver Mar 26, 2024 @ 2:58pm 
Originally posted by dbvel:
I agree bg3 is buggy as hell, I've met almost-game-breaking bugs many times. NPCs and companions do forget things and lack continuity many times. That being said, I can't understand how can someone feel like there's not enough content, since there are so many memorable npcs and hours of so many fun (side) quests and dialogues etc... dozens of hours literally. But well, we're way off topic, I'll stop here. I still have to play pathfinder wotr, I've only played kingmaker.
This guy basicaly summed it up good.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RI7a_JQz4Xg&t=757s
revan1229 Mar 26, 2024 @ 6:54pm 
Originally posted by ajfusch:
Multiplayer makes all but a single player sidekicks, with the one player being the chosen one. Who wants that? That's a good reason for there being no multiplayer at all.
I'm sure BG 1 didn't have multiplayer, either, BG 2 might have had it ... can't remember. Still, same thing.
That's why Icewind Dale had Multiplayer - there wasn't a "chosen one" storyline, all chars were equal.
They did have it, but I agree that it feels odd to play a very narrative and dialogue heavy story revolving around one character with someone else. MP works best when it's isolated to a mode specifically for it, imo. I'd be open to Treasure of the Midnight Isles being MP.
< >
Showing 1-13 of 13 comments
Per page: 1530 50

Date Posted: Mar 27, 2023 @ 1:34am
Posts: 13