Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Wrath is much more enjoyable to actually play.
boths are superb games but I like the npc more in kingmaker and the story
Gameplaywise I think you'll find it easier to play kingmaker first. And learning the systems there will make Wrath much easier to get into afterwards.
Hopefully the next game is based on Pathfinder 2e though
Plus the kingdom management system is in my opinion pure garbage, that you sadly can't just ignore. You can put it on auto but you will still need to wait for events to trigger and all that. I just can't stand it.
Eine Änderung in der Ini oder eine mod oder ähnliches?
Bis auf Pillars of eternity war in jedem CRPG die Schrift zu klein für meine schlechten Augen.
Both are good games, but if you are entierlty new to RPG then a game like Pillars of Eternity might be better(while not based on Pathfinder), as the character building is not as important.
I imagine in game design they learned a lot, but im not sure about Kingmaker but WOTR (maybe both) have a huge amount of customisation in the difficulty settings which is great. So while you are learning either one, you can change the settings to suit what you're enjoying/finding frustrating.
but I also have experience with 3.5 DnD soo.... not hard for me to "settle" in this game...