Steam installieren
Anmelden
|
Sprache
简体中文 (Vereinfachtes Chinesisch)
繁體中文 (Traditionelles Chinesisch)
日本語 (Japanisch)
한국어 (Koreanisch)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarisch)
Čeština (Tschechisch)
Dansk (Dänisch)
English (Englisch)
Español – España (Spanisch – Spanien)
Español – Latinoamérica (Lateinamerikanisches Spanisch)
Ελληνικά (Griechisch)
Français (Französisch)
Italiano (Italienisch)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesisch)
Magyar (Ungarisch)
Nederlands (Niederländisch)
Norsk (Norwegisch)
Polski (Polnisch)
Português – Portugal (Portugiesisch – Portugal)
Português – Brasil (Portugiesisch – Brasilien)
Română (Rumänisch)
Русский (Russisch)
Suomi (Finnisch)
Svenska (Schwedisch)
Türkçe (Türkisch)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamesisch)
Українська (Ukrainisch)
Ein Übersetzungsproblem melden
The case of Crane Style is because the monk class give it as an option and allows you to bypass the normal requirements. Similar situation with rangers being able to take Improved Precise Shot at level six despite not having a BaB of +11 at that point.
There is at least one feat that I know of that does care about prerequites in order to work. Dazzling Display. I had built a character and took an option that gave me Dazzling Display but I didn't have a Weapon Focus feat. And the Dazzling Display didn't work because of that.
It doesn't seem like it was intended, as they never gave any specific rules for it, but it's such an obvious thing that people did it and ended up asking about it.
Even though it was never officially FAQed as far as I am aware the lead game designer (Jason Bulmahn) came out and said that "Generally you need to permanently have the stat or feat prerequisites to select another feat, however in the case of magical items granting stat bonuses the stat bonus can count towards prerequisites as long as it is worn full time."
(I assume that by full time he means never removed.)
It's janky, but it's the kind of thing that ends up happening with rulesets as complex as pathfinder. Interactions which seem like they should have been obvious end up getting overlooked. In a lot of ways pathfinder isn't even that bad. Shadowrun for example where entire supplements simply can't be properly played because they don't give you a full ruleset for how the supplement creatures are able to interact with the world.
Demonslayer is very OP, but I wouldn't want to take the penalty for dual scimitars
I’m fairly certain this isn’t true in Pathfinder 2nd edition.
Can always put a shortsword I’m my offhand. But yeah, you’re probably right.
Yeah I know I'm just saying I think if the Paizo devs used to be cool with it, I don't think they are now.
Dagger is a good one since the hasty eradicator gives you +2 off hand attacks. That also kind of ties into one of the best things ranger has over slayer, the animal. You can ride a horse with legendary proportions, giving you a full attack every round with the most OP size buffs (plus lead blades giving you and extra weapon size die).
So, if you have used Monk to bypass prereqs for Crane style, you would have to go back and get Dodge before you could pick up Crane Wing and Crane Riposte. And if you lost enough Dex to to lose access to Dodge, it would cause a cascading failure that would cause you to lose access to Crane Wing and Crane Riposte.
This can be a problem when relying items to qualify for Feats. It gives you a new vulnerability that can be attacked. IIRC a tageted Dispel magic (or possibly Greater) can turn off an item for a few rounds in key situations. Or, more likely, you have to be extra careful against ability damage. Antimagic fields are also a problem but are rare enough that they aren't totally worth mentioning.
None of this applies to WotR. Losing prereqs at any time do not disable your Feats. In the Crane Style example, a monk with 7 Dex can pick up Dodge by equiping a +6 item for long enough to level up. Then remove the item to no ill effect. Or could skip the prereqs for Dodge instead and pick up the Crane Style line unimpeded by items at all.