ITALIAN LANGUAGE

[-TWI-Commodoro]

italian language will soon avaible?

[mbradtke]

rather unlikely that there will be any more official locas, sorry, game is out for a long time already so you can guess that they are done with that part

[Tiranno Matto]

They could just "hire" some community guys already working on Kingmaker ITA localization, named TIGER Team.

[Red{Ita}]

+1

[Starrok]

Hello. Currently there are no plans to add more localizations for Pathfinder Wrath of the Righteous.

[davoli.fabrizio]

+1

[Bustok]

Originally posted by Starrok:

Hello. Currently there are no plans to add more localizations for Pathfinder Wrath of the Righteous.

In the age of AI, the limit of translation is not acceptable.

[Roaming Zombie]

Originally posted by Bustok:

Originally posted by Starrok:

Hello. Currently there are no plans to add more localizations for Pathfinder Wrath of the Righteous.

In the age of AI, the limit of translation is not acceptable.

Even in the age of AI humans still need to double check if there are no mistakes. Humans do not work for free.

[luketto-93]

+1 for italian language pack

[MarS]

As the localisation is just one big json file (\Wrath_Data\StreamingAssets\Localization\), there is nothing to stop you from doing a fan based translation (maybe with the help of AI?). I don't know if you are allowed to distribute the file without Owlcats and/or Paizos consent though.
Alas I can't help you with the translation as my knowlege of the italian language is sub par.
gracie and arrivederci!

[Teleni Audanie]

+1

[Teleni Audanie]

Because the game is free?

Originally posted by Roaming Zombie:

Originally posted by Bustok:

In the age of AI, the limit of translation is not acceptable.

Even in the age of AI humans still need to double check if there are no mistakes. Humans do not work for free.

[Razer]

Originally posted by Roaming Zombie:

Originally posted by Bustok:

In the age of AI, the limit of translation is not acceptable.

Even in the age of AI humans still need to double check if there are no mistakes. Humans do not work for free.

Even using AI you will have to pay the original VA. Why do people think that copying a person's voice is ok without consent? Legally your voice is part of your identity and can only be used if you agree. And a VA will only do paid work so hence the VA needs to agree and sign a contract that details to what level AI will be used and then needs to be reimbursed for it.

[Schlumpsha]

Originally posted by Razer:

Even using AI you will have to pay the original VA. Why do people think that copying a person's voice is ok? Legally it's part of your identity and can only be used if you agree. And a VA will only do paid work so hence the VA needs to agree and sign a contract that details to what level AI will be used and then needs to be reimbursed for it.

Different issue. Audio rendering in WotR is only available in English. Whereas translations of the text has been done for 5 languages, aside English. That's where AI comes into play - not to emulate the VA spoken lines with trained voice models, but rather to auto translate the text itself.

Sure, you still need a human to proof read (preferable someone who speaks both languages). AI translation isn't THAT good just yet. But it is one objective way to cut down costs tremendously. Hence why many studios opt now to cut off their localization teams entirely in favor of AI. Happens outside of the gaming industry as well.

[Razer]

Originally posted by Schlumpsha:

Originally posted by Razer:

Even using AI you will have to pay the original VA. Why do people think that copying a person's voice is ok? Legally it's part of your identity and can only be used if you agree. And a VA will only do paid work so hence the VA needs to agree and sign a contract that details to what level AI will be used and then needs to be reimbursed for it.

Different issue. Audio rendering in WotR is only available in English. Whereas translations of the text has been done for 5 languages, aside English. That's where AI comes into play - not to emulate the VA spoken lines with trained voice models, but rather to auto translate the text itself.

Sure, you still need a human to proof read (preferable someone who speaks both languages). AI translation isn't THAT good just yet. But it is one objective way to cut down costs tremendously. Hence why many studios opt now to cut off their localization teams entirely in favor of AI. Happens outside of the gaming industry as well.

I don't know. Cyberpunk 2077 had 2500 hours recorded dialogue. With an average rate of 200 dollars per hour you'd look at something like 500.000 for a AAA game. That's not a whole lot to be honest. Indie companies can go for voice actors that cost a fraction of that.

Owlcat has mostly unknown voice actors, so they should be cheap in comparison.

[Schlumpsha]

Originally posted by Razer:

I don't know. Cyberpunk 2077 had 2500 hours recorded dialogue. With an average rate of 200 dollars per hour you'd look at something like 500.000 for a AAA game. That's not a whole lot to be honest. Indie companies can go for voice actors that cost a fraction of that.

Owlcat has mostly unknown voice actors, so they should be cheap in comparison.

Apples and oranges. Cyberpunk 2077 has VA for 11 different languages. With 8 languages having only text based translations.

Owlcat games don't have that luxury. For now at least. Maybe their upcoming games after Rogue Trader will feature non-English VA. Who knows.