Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Damage is the same as with strength as long as you are actually using Spell Combat, and if you do not want to use Spell Combat and get more damage from strength, you could also just play an other class instead.
Higher damage means dimension strike and other class specific attack bonuses are more effective.
I played this build on Hard without completely min maxing and ac wasn't an issue, so maybe can tank unfair too.
A Str build means using armour, having to take a fighter level for armour proficiency just messes up your build.
Why not use an Armored Battlemage if you want to go strength.
Damage is not even close to the same as STR vs dex lol. Since spell combat is wasted on a SS. You do not want to be casting spells on combat on a class that already has very limited spell slots. This is really a bad habit people seem to think since SS has both spell combat and spellstrike that they should be using them. They are a buff and burn alpha striker, not a magus with a little bit more damage.