Official wiki is awful.

[Gtlg]

It's the best available source for information on the game (that I've found so far) and it lacks so much depth. There are no specifics on most pages, some pages just reroute you back to previous pages, and the descriptions on some of them are incorrect.

If there is no better option, can we start filling it out?

[Naked Granny]

There is no official wiki. There's just wikis that fans have started.

The game has only been out for four or five days.

Wikis are contributed to by users. If you want a wiki to have more information, then you should add that information to the wiki...

[phimseto]

Wikis are definitely a player run thing even if someone (like fextralife) does an initial set up. What are some of the priority entries that you'd be looking for? I know for me, I'd love to see some definitive info on how to get each mythic path.

[Damedius]

The Fextralife wiki is the best I have found so far.

[Naked Granny]

Nothing is stopping you guys from poking around in the game and documenting what you see and writing about it on the wiki of your choosing...

[Kurosu]

What wiki are you reffering to ? There is no official wiki . You can use fextralife like Damedius said but its not an official one.

If you go to pathfinder wiki you will mostly find stuff about the tabletop.

[RocketMan]

noddawizard님이 먼저 게시:

It's the best available source for information on the game (that I've found so far) and it lacks so much depth. There are no specifics on most pages, some pages just reroute you back to previous pages, and the descriptions on some of them are incorrect.

If there is no better option, can we start filling it out?

The main wiki was filled in by people who didn't play the game and just took info from path finder. Which is why it's so awful.

Go to neoseeker instead, much better info.

[Myst]

Damedius님이 먼저 게시:

The Fextralife wiki is the best I have found so far.

Fextralife wiki is nothing but an empty shell meant to bait viewers for their twitch channel.

[Kurosu]

Mail me to the Moon님이 먼저 게시:

noddawizard님이 먼저 게시:

It's the best available source for information on the game (that I've found so far) and it lacks so much depth. There are no specifics on most pages, some pages just reroute you back to previous pages, and the descriptions on some of them are incorrect.

If there is no better option, can we start filling it out?

The main wiki was filled in by people who didn't play the game and just took info from path finder. Which is why it's so awful.

Go to neoseeker instead, much better info.

Take neoseeker with a grain of salt. They havent updated the walkthrough since forever (it barely covers until mid act 2 and is missing stuff even in act 1) As for the builds , their author is a theorycrafter that doesnt actually test them . There is a funny story about it back in Kingmaker.

Use the information there as templates till you get the hang of the game then go forward on your own or use other websites

[Mikoto]

Damedius님이 먼저 게시:

The Fextralife wiki is the best I have found so far.

"Best"

[Naked Granny]

Kurosu님이 먼저 게시:

What wiki are you reffering to ? There is no official wiki . You can use fextralife like Damedius said but its not an official one.

If you go to pathfinder wiki you will mostly find stuff about the tabletop.

That's because it's not a wiki, that's the Source Reference Document. Pathfinder (sort of colloquially called "1st edition" now to distinguish it from Paizo's proprietary PF2) is legally under the Open Game License which D&D 3.5 was released under. So all the non-setting-specific mechanics and things are public and free to access. Paizo only has exclusive rights to their setting and adventures they've created (like the Wrath Of The Righteous Adventure Path that this game is based on).

[Gtlg]

There is some overlap between the tabletop version and this game, and it's helped with theory crafting but not by much. Before I started adding a bunch of information to the wiki, I wanted to see if there was an official one and if not what the best available one was.

The fextralife wiki says it's the official one, but (after reading comments), it seems this is not true. I will look into the neoseeker one, but if neither of them feel right, do we have more options? If not, which one should I spend my time on? We should poll the community so no one wastes their time on a wiki nobody uses.

[DCRWrites]

I would think Fextralife because that's where Google seems to be pointing.

[Naked Granny]

noddawizard님이 먼저 게시:

The fextralife wiki says it's the official one, but (after reading comments), it seems this is not true.

Fextralife makes money by getting people to visit the site and view ads and click stuff.

Of course they are gonna claim to be the "official" wiki for everything. They're just lying because it makes money for them. It's pretty simple.

[Pepe]

Neoseeker has the most information thus far yet. Fextra ends up being useful in a year or so, probably. At least what people did for the DOS2 is what I am hoping to eventually find with wotr too.

[Kurosu]

Aunt Tony님이 먼저 게시:

noddawizard님이 먼저 게시:

The fextralife wiki says it's the official one, but (after reading comments), it seems this is not true.

Fextralife makes money by getting people to visit the site and view ads and click stuff.

Of course they are gonna claim to be the "official" wiki for everything. They're just lying because it makes money for them. It's pretty simple.

I realised the extent of Fextralife's "joke" while playing Nioh. They have a ton of pages and links to bosses and missions that are EMPTY . Some even have huge texts in latin as a template .

If you check some missions of Wrath of the righteous they are full of "??????" .

In short the Fextralife's trick is this : they create pages for everything they can in games especially missions . This allows their page to show up on search results. Its basically a clickbait system

Builds from authors like Castielle are usually good but the majority of the wiki is a huge scam

Sure, its a wiki that needs to be edited by the users. I accept that . Someone needs to bother with it . But how come pages get created by "someone" and then that "someone" doesnt bother to put information in it ?