For people who are fammiliar with TableTop

[wise]

which class/archetype would you most want to see implemented and why, I'm really curious

[kiloromeo]

Inquisitor - SinEater

Heal on slain enemies.

[アンジェル]

I actually would see more races... classwise I think spiritualists I would expect as addon. Finnean kinda teases it. Otherwise gunslinger or samurai, just for the sake of having something exotic.

[kiloromeo]

Shaman - Speaker for the Past.

Very cool "time-stop"/ move whole party/front fighters for fullattack but prob hard to implement.

[アンジェル]

Originally posted by kiloromeo:

Shaman - Speaker for the Past.

Very cool "time-stop"/ move whole party/front fighters for fullattack but prob hard to implement.

Maybe if it is limited to objects who are participating in the actual combat. It could some masked "Hold X" thingy on everyone but the time mage.

[Stink Bug]

I really liked the Investigator and Spiritualist when I played them in Kingmaker (added by the Call of the Wild mod) but the former is so micromanagement heavy to play Owlcat probably won’t even consider it. They’ve mentioned the Summoner requiring too many new assets for them to justify adding before, but the Spiritualist doesn’t have such an issue.

I would really like to see though an expansion to the polymorph and summon spells. With all the new creature models they have more than enough assets to fix these into being more like tabletop. There’s no reason for beast shape II to only offer a medium leopard for instance, or plant shape to not exist.

[ManDudely]

Shifter, because I want Wild Shape on a Full BAB chassis. Investigator is just great. Summoner for the Eidolon shenanigans, but I understand that would be a lot of work.

[Takichi]

I would Love to see 2 Third Party Classes(but i dont think we will get them ever^^)
Dragonrider and Vorpal Knight :D

[DarkFenix]

I'd love to see crossblooded sorcerer. The real one that is, not the bastardised abomination Owlcat put in. That along with a full selection of sorcerer bloodlines.

[philip.j.campbell123]

Wow it's been two hours and no ones mentioned gunslinger yet and only one mention of summoner.
Of course both would be a total pain to implement so don't get your hopes up.

[アンジェル]

Originally posted by philip.j.campbell123:

Wow it's been two hours and no ones mentioned gunslinger yet and only one mention of summoner.
Of course both would be a total pain to implement so don't get your hopes up.

Hey... that is mean. I mentioned gunslinger.

[kiloromeo]

I really don't want gunslingers implemented ... others might wish to play them, and I would be fine with that, but I would not want to meet them as enemies. Most broken class.

[JonWoo]

As far as classes go, Summoner and Gunslinger. No archetypes in particular for those.

For what's in the game I'd like to see the Spell Breaker and Master of Many Styles are the first that come to mind.

[wise]

Originally posted by philip.j.campbell123:

Wow it's been two hours and no ones mentioned gunslinger yet and only one mention of summoner.
Of course both would be a total pain to implement so don't get your hopes up.

AFAIK Call of the wild already implemented summoner and it worked pretty well so that might not be such a pain to implement

[CDI Link]

I was hoping to see more basic fighter archetypes for this game. With the addition of turn-base maybe Mobile Fighter...Or something like Archer. Other than that maybe Trapper Ranger would be fun

[Cloverskull]

Is artificer part of Pathfinder yet or is it just D&D?