Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
hope baldurs gate wont suffer same issues.
It is rarely the developers who pushes a game out to be released. More a matter of the publisher who wants to see their investment back and running out of budget. There are more than often enough cases were small developers team ended up running out of money due to... capitalistic planning.
What I do mean with that: think of all the moments when one said "it takes 10 days to finish X", or "it would cost us only 50 USD for Y", just to have those anticipations blown up with much much higher need than actually "anticipated". Not expected or anticipated - more planned lean on purpose to attract investors in the first place.
Yes, I believe they could have used another 6 months of polish and bug-fix time to make the game solid, but there are TONS of reasons why that can't happen sometimes. From publishers pushing a company to get SOMETHING out the door because they want their money to the dev company itself needing money and having to release early in order to keep their doors open. Not publishing in either case can shut a company down.
Which is better, in your opinion - to get a 99% working game with some bugs that still needs some polish and a dev team that is working their asses off to fix those bugs, or a closed studio that never gets a chance to fix those bugs and a possibly never-released game?
The answer, to me, is obvious. Big AAA studios have the luxury of taking that extra 6 months of polish and bug-fix time. Smaller studios often do not. It's not a perfect world, but the choices here are pretty stark, so I'm willing to forgive a smaller studio (especially one that is so obviously producing a labor of love that they are as passionate about as the fans) a buggy release as long as I know they are continuing to work on it.
I may have to just wait that 6 months before I play the game, but I know I'll be able to eventually. Better that than a studio that is too stupid to release early with some bugs and gets shut down. That's no good for them, the game, or the fans.
So, yeah, I'm totally down with helping them fix their bugs if I can. I love this game almost as much as they do and I'm positive they want it perfect even more than I do. That seems a lot more productive than whining about a buggy release and flaming the devs (to me, that's like kicking a puppy, honestly).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CKpQv16FyA0
This is my 2nd playtrough (first was angel path) and didn't have this obvious issue with buffs so I im wondering if its related to me being an azata.
I already tried re-installing/deleting the files in the appdata folder and Stripping said character naked, saving in that state, and then restarting the game but no luck.
I'm wondering if its the effects of buffs that are causing them.You mentioned you only get them in combat while mine still linger outside of combat.