Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Cav is basicly the same as Fighter just with a Rideable Animal Horse xD So ofc he isnt comparable to a Full Caster or Some other Things. I mean thats Normal, a Fighter never can Compete with a Full Caster xD And there are a lot of Builds which outclass both Pure Fullcaster and Full Fighter anyway xD
Basicly your Post Boilse down to 3 Things:
1. Ist a Buggy Mess - On which a fully agree, there is a lot bugged with Cav atm, sadly.
2. I dont like Non Magical Chars because they are boring ( well thats how Non Magic Chars work, they only Autohit in different ways and thats it).
And Third: I wanna cry for cryings sake because i need atention.
So now you got the Attention have fun with it :D
But they don't have to AA only. They can Trip, they can Disarm, they can Sickening Strike etc. Something I like to do on a Monk. Not every physical class is AA to death, not even damage dealers.
And then there are people like me who like robustness and reliability of physicals who can do most things without prebuffing etc(on non masochist difficulties). Prebuffing is fine for difficult fights, but it gets REALLY tiresome when you have to do it on per trash encounter basis.
With that said, bugs should be fixed, duh.
of course, that was once in like 70 hours of playtime that somehow the charge worked (only in rtwp), it TB mode, mounted combat broke completely.
Well yeah you can "Grapple" and these things.... But Technicly speaking that could also do the Gnome Bard and the Half-Elf Wizard :D But yeah there are more Options than AA thats true.
Thing is, they couldn't. Because, as you are mostly aware, it includes taking Feats etc to maximize those actions. That way Sensei can tank, support, debuff, he isn't half bad. Just unorthodox.
Sure it needs Feats, but a lot of them could be taken by a Wizard. Ofc if you do that, why not play a Fighter (or smth) in the First Place, but theoreticly speaking a Wizard could do that aswell, while a Fighter(only sticking with that Class) can never truely learn any magic :D
Wow !! If the Mighty You cannot play it properly, how can poor, insignificant me manage to do so !!
Either that, or your 200 hours were clearly wasted, as you have no clue what you are doing.
If you charge on a mount, using a reach weapon, you will be attacking as soon as you come within reach - and as your mount does NOT have a reach weapon, it won't attack.
Tactician feats coordinate with other companions - if it is a mounted tactical feat then the companion must be mounted - but their is NO need for everyone to have those feats. And yes, if you plan on using a cavalier with tactician, you need to keep that in mind when you plan out advancement of other classes - but you should ALWAYS have the group's needs in mind when advancing each companion, as to what and how each will contribute and how they will coordinate.
I could go on, but I probably have little I can teach a master such as yourself.
I'm repeatedly getting this 'being crazy' issue when I using trample with Cav character, not horse. I think it is not related to item whatever it is. I learned trample on Cav, not horse. But Horse can do it too and It doesn't get crazy when horse use it. But when Cav use trample, It gets mad after that.
So are you being sarcastic like some other people? to laugh at me?
And do you think I didn't learned those things yet?
Actually, I don't care what you are thinking about the game.
I just wrote it for purpose of record or report to devs because quality of game is very disappointing.
I'm not a native Eng speaker and sentences could be rough and not precise.
I saw many people ridicule others treating as idiocy saying basic knowledge of the game in various cases, especially on english culture sites. Also, I saw those people fond of mockery ruining some games in some cases. So are you saying that blaming about Cavalier is childish and "there are great potential on it !! learn it stupid !!"? I'm asking because I'm really curious about it. Not just for you, I'm asking to all people opposing me. Actually, I don't care about getting reply like you. As I said, I wrote it to devs, not YOU.
Maybe it can be 'strong' enough like what you said. But I don't think it is different from real 'strong'. 900+ dmg ? I saw 3000+ dmg other build on Youtube. I think they are not a 'strong build'. They are just broken balance, broken game and 'broken build', not a strong build, no fun at all.
https://i.imgur.com/k5Cco6P.png
here example of lvl 10 'not fully yet' cavalier - (hunter dip for a deer pet because i wanted a deer for fun.. 2h war dip because i wanted to use 2h scyth better) - actually even 4 lvls into cavalier
That deer has ac ~40, more with buffs, not min maxing anything, just building for fun. So i would definitly not say the class sucks.
It usually happens when the model of your mount is too big. For example, Triceratops. I chose Deer for that reason after respec - works just fine. And yeh. reach weapons bugged currently, so went with a scythe for extra safety.