Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I agree.
I think the devs decided to kill Hugo purely for shock value.
Either that, or they didn't know how to proceed with his character. Either way, it worked as a depressing and emotional ending, but I would've preferred if they didn't kill him off after just two games.
From previus scenes it's obvius hugo gets worse when bad things happen to his friends, specially when they die...
The whole ending sequance is prompted by hugo thinking Amicia is dead. So he in character wouldn't stop just because she dies... or ... idk, it's weird either way
Either way only thing I'm sad about is that we won't see more games with the old cast. Because when I think back to it, the new cast tends to ruin the whole thing for me (like assissins creed after Ezio or Life is Strange as examples). And let's be honest this game is far longer and better built then what you expect from an obscure title like this.
I agree the ending was incredibly emotional, but through both Innocence and Requiem it's pretty clear that Hugo most likely will die (in some form or another). And in Requiem they state it outright on the boat ride to La Cuna with Hugo talking about it himself.
Doesn't make it any easier. I get teary eyes from just hearing the sound track. Particularly the song "Brother".
And just because the ending was sad doesn't mean it wasn't worth reaching it.
Life always ends in death, doesn't mean it's not worth living.
I agree, partially. Continuing with the old characters whose story is already finished can be really bad, but forcing new characters into a franchise where the main charm was the original cast won't help either. There are stories that isn't meant to have sequels.
Personally i would not play this sequel if known, it has such depressing ending.
I enjoyed this game...
It's mindset seams to be European, suffer all your life, into the next.
If I remember the story line.
The first plague was in 5-6 century?
So my problem is that's 700 years between plagues??
But the end showed another child born with Macaula.
No year when child's born, only the idea it might be in Amicia's time???
Doesn't make since with history of events?¿?
I don't know...