PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE MULTIPLAYER

[Toddwick]

You will have at least 4 purchases from myself, family/friends if you add multiplayer (as well as a glowing review). Look at the data on steam across the board - players WANT to play together. ADD THIS GUYS. ADD IT! Look at games like Wasteland 3, baldur's gate 3, spaceland; tactical non-coinflip games are and will dominate sales. THANKS FOR MAKING THIS CONTENT.

[Reignterror]

Use parsec... turn every game into multiplayer

[Axios]

I have to wonder... what would multiplayer in Urtuk actually be?

The obvious answer would be an arena style game where you have points to pick your teamd and then fight it out... Sure that could be fun; but much of the enjoyment from Urtuk is from the campaign and building your team. Just picking attributes and duking it out could only really hold my interest for so long.

A more interesting idea would be Multiplayer campaign... but god knows how that would work. Maybe you play co-op and share half a team each? Or maybe conquest mode... difficult to say.

[Toddwick]

I should have clarified; co-op is the the best possible long term interest generator and free marketing addition. The way they should implement it is something almost exactly on par with the game "for the king". Up to 3 players, or 2, with one taking 2 party members and the other one. For the king brings players back again and again with no new content simply to play together. The smart developers and studios are figuring this out

[DT]

Did battle brother have co-op?

[Toddwick]

Nobody wants to play with their friends?

[Path]

Not really, no. It's a niche genre as it is, and while there's always a vocal minority who want MP in everything, it's debatable whether it'd pay off to use dev time for that as opposed to improving other aspects of the game. MP games may dominate the Steam boards, but it's a different player base.

[vitez_vaddiszno]

Yes do the For the King model.

[rassen]

Why would you want multi in a tactic game, i dont know.