Установить Steam
войти
|
язык
简体中文 (упрощенный китайский)
繁體中文 (традиционный китайский)
日本語 (японский)
한국어 (корейский)
ไทย (тайский)
Български (болгарский)
Čeština (чешский)
Dansk (датский)
Deutsch (немецкий)
English (английский)
Español - España (испанский)
Español - Latinoamérica (латиноам. испанский)
Ελληνικά (греческий)
Français (французский)
Italiano (итальянский)
Bahasa Indonesia (индонезийский)
Magyar (венгерский)
Nederlands (нидерландский)
Norsk (норвежский)
Polski (польский)
Português (португальский)
Português-Brasil (бразильский португальский)
Română (румынский)
Suomi (финский)
Svenska (шведский)
Türkçe (турецкий)
Tiếng Việt (вьетнамский)
Українська (украинский)
Сообщить о проблеме с переводом
Beyond the obvious advantages of having more processing power, there was also more memory on the SNES cartridges, which meant they could have more story. It definitely has one of the best stories in the series, in my opinion. I certainly found the characters more engaging than in any other FF game, but nostalgia likely plays a part in that. FF IV (called FF 2 back then) was the first Final Fantasy game I really got into as a kid.
It was definitely one of the more popular titles, in no small part because FF II and FF III didn't get released in North America until years later. Which is likely why it got a little more love than the previous entries (along with a sequel). Both the PR and 3D remakes have touched up the story and expanded on it a little, and have given the characters a bit more depth than they had in the original version. I don't think the earlier entries got anything more than a basic port/remaster (but I could be wrong).
FF4-6 are the result of that education; you get a story that is more well-rounded. You get better written characters, better game mechanics, and a journey away from certain things that were limiting on the way you played (moving to the MP system from the D&D-style spell level system, for instance). You also get grander scope; in FF3, you have tiny dungeons for the entire game, mostly because there are no save points outside of the overworld, whereas FF4 begins giving you rest points mid-dungeon before bosses. Little pacing things like that rounded out the game and made it flow better, on top of everything else.
Still, the biggest thing is that leap to new hardware, and you see it with a LOT of series (look at the MegaMan games on the NES at the end of its hardware life vs their SNES games at the START of its life). It made such a massive difference in what they could do for these games.
FF4 is a fun straight foward RPG. Not too many places to get lost in and all you have to do to get stronger is lvl up. It's like a super sized version of FF1.
Story -
Yeah its good. like a 2 hour fantasy epic movie. Engaging for your first time.
Only FF3 Job System gives FF4 a run for its money in the gameplay department. But FF3 suffers from some Tedious dungeons and pacing issues.
( i am comparing FF4 only to the first 1-3 games )
I agree Vambran, FF3 I did struggle here and there with the pacing issue, it got to the point i just wanted to overlevel before Ancient maze and so on. The tedious dungeons weren't too much of a problem but they were a nuisance to do, im guessing you're talking about the forced Mini and Toad situations.
Yeah man! I've played this countless times since the early 90s and every time the story is still good!