Steamをインストール
ログイン
|
言語
简体中文(簡体字中国語)
繁體中文(繁体字中国語)
한국어 (韓国語)
ไทย (タイ語)
български (ブルガリア語)
Čeština(チェコ語)
Dansk (デンマーク語)
Deutsch (ドイツ語)
English (英語)
Español - España (スペイン語 - スペイン)
Español - Latinoamérica (スペイン語 - ラテンアメリカ)
Ελληνικά (ギリシャ語)
Français (フランス語)
Italiano (イタリア語)
Bahasa Indonesia(インドネシア語)
Magyar(ハンガリー語)
Nederlands (オランダ語)
Norsk (ノルウェー語)
Polski (ポーランド語)
Português(ポルトガル語-ポルトガル)
Português - Brasil (ポルトガル語 - ブラジル)
Română(ルーマニア語)
Русский (ロシア語)
Suomi (フィンランド語)
Svenska (スウェーデン語)
Türkçe (トルコ語)
Tiếng Việt (ベトナム語)
Українська (ウクライナ語)
翻訳の問題を報告
I wonder do you put all of this hyper focused criticism to all of the games your interested in or just the ones caught up in drama?
I've played AAA games that are "jankier" then this game, and some of the most beloved RPGs are in fact "janky" yet people highly enjoy them (Gothic 1-2, Eldersrolls 3-5, Fallout 3-NV, Witcher 1-3, Demon/Dark Souls 1, Stalker, VTM: Bloodlines,...etc.)
What you find Janky others will not so your points are not really "facts" its your opinion.
yes i have criticism when games are unfinished and rushed to release. this is a common problem. i do not think they are worth buying until fixed. i never said that was a fact. i even used the word opinion. you are a habitual liar. the only fact i claimed was that the devs were caught with stolen assets. again, this is fact.
Yah just block em like I did.
Ehh I usually like playing with the haters/trolls because half of them can never defend any of their points without name calling or ad hominem attacks.
Some people just play dumb when in reality they just want to stir up something.
i am not a troll all i did was state a fact, and i have not name called, but you 3 all did. you could have left my initial message alone but you are the ones that replied to stir up drama (trolling) because you did not like the fact presented. facts do not need to be defended, they are facts. i am still waiting for your point by the way, as none has been made.. only lies. i even invited you to message me privately but you insisted on replying here repeatedly.
Lol, valid.
Yeah thats all you seem to be able to do is "state a fact". A "fact" that has been proven false given the recent updates from the devs on the topic of the animations/assets (you never address this).
You stating that same old "fact" is equivalent to me reading and believing some random online article that was "true" when it was released, but years later was been proven incorrect or no longer valid. Your getting call out because your "facts" seem to start and stop at the release of the game, and seem to gloss over the updates, and devs announces/explanation regarding the issue.
My POINT has always been that you keep stating this "fact" when it has already been rectified and proved not completely true by more recent developments.
This will be my last serious non jokey post for you because you sound like a broken record that is scratched and stuck repeating the same thing.
the devs were caught using stolen assets. this is a fact. deal with it. maybe if they didn't release an unfinished game they could have sorted this out before they had people pay to beta test for them.
The verb catch only applies when, and thus implies, doing something wrong. Accusing someone of a harmful intent, and thus a crime, requires proof or it is a libelous statement. Did I just "catch" you breaking libel laws, or did I merely accuse you of such and are you innocent until proven guilty by a court of law? Reality is the devs won't sue you over it either way, so it doesn't matter, just like the devs haven't been sued by Fromsoft and likely never will be. Neither of you have been "caught" doing any wrong. Next time try using the verb "found using" instead of "caught using" and you can actually be all smug and feel superior over being technically correct, unlike now.
Epic Mic Drop moment (except wentzelitis will still reply thinking they have something valid to say, which they do not.)
you are still caught with a stolen car. sorry. that's the facts. it looks bad, and there's no way around that. being caught with something = looks bad/unfortunate/unexpected, caught in traffic, etc. does not necessarily mean guilty (looks like you need to educate yourself on the english language) if it didn't look bad, they wouldn't be "catching" so much flack. you can be caught with something without being guilty, but i also never said they were innocent. i simply stated a fact and left it at that, but then white knights made things up to fit their narrative and ran with it. reality is most people will probably never know the truth. were they aware the animations were stolen and still released them anyway? i say the odds are favorable that's actually the case, but i can't say for sure. most people don't accidentally buy something that's stolen, and have a suspicion at the least (why's it so cheap? why's it being sold in an alley?). none of that really matters. the fact is they were caught using stolen assets, and their game was rushed and unfinished. stolen assets is just one area that this presents itself. if they would have taken time to finish their game first, they could have possibly sorted this out before release and not had to act victims, replace assets (only after being forced to btw, and still proudly sold the game before they were fully removed)
nice edit immediately after i posted to fit my new post, showing you clearly didn't block me and keep obsessively waiting for my responses and continue lying . "caught" you :)