Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Discussions Rules and Guidelines
Report this post
And by the way the Expansion Pass of the Royal Edition is now called Chapter 1.
And theocracies will never come to CK with a DLC only with Mods, but luckily the Devs are removing the Ironman requirement for Achievements with the next Patch.
Like for Royal Court, at least let counts and dukes have their own court, maybe not as grand, but I reckon they still had some sort of office where they discussed stuff with their council. Why do I need to be a king to be able to hold court? And why not let us free roam the camera? I thought the point was to be able to see the people in our court, but I have to do so with weird preset camera angles.
Struggle mechanic sounds great, but the reality is that it's poorly thought out with ending the struggle in itself being a struggle but not the fun kind.
Friends&Foes added broken house feuds that has dumb things like you getting into a feud, then ending it, but the other house didn't get the memo so they're still hatching murder plots against you because that's all the AI seems to think when it comes to feuds, just straight up murder, even if they're compassionate, content, just, and honest folk. Then, you also get into another feud because your grandson decided to make fun of someone's pp in a bathhouse and you, as head of the house, has no say on starting a feud. It just happens. So now you're feuding against another house, while the house that didn't get the memo has a one sided feud against you.
Only real fun I had was with Northern Lords.
So you're saying if I own the Royal Court Edition, I don't need to purchase Tours & Tourneys? Wooo some good news!
They had plans for some DLC. They packaged that DLC in the Royal Edition.
The game sold really well. People are still playing it and hungry for more content. So they set out to make a new set of DLC.
As before, they're packaging that DLC together, in a pack they're calling "Season 2" content.
As for not liking the DLC you got... Well, that's unfortunate, no other way to put it. Personally I quite enjoy all of it, but I got lucky that way.
I thought of this as well, but after thinking through it deeply, the answer is pretty simple - it is performance heavy. There are more counts and dukes on the map than kings and emperors. If every one of them gets a courtroom, the game probably wont run smoothly.
Probably 90% of my playtime is in mods and CK2 + CK3 hold a complete monopoly on the very specific 'medieval dynastic grand strategy' niche. Despite the fact that CK2 is deeply visually outdated, most of my friends refuse to play CK3 over CK2 and I can't say I really blame them. As others in this thread have already mention, the DLC released to date has been appallingly bad, adding nothing but frustrating clutter (struggle mechanics, feuds, holding court) while also being more expensive than CK2 expansions that significantly added to the game. The initial release with custom religions, culture blending and an expanded map was promising but the DLC released to date has been an embarrassment and it's ridiculous that this latest DLC isn't part of the Royal Edition despite the fact that said Royal Edition added nothing substantive or fun at all.
how did you convince your friends to buy 300+ dollars of DLC content for CK2?
Or does it work like if only one person has them they can host so everyone can use the content?
Yeah, it's only the host DLC that gets checked. Generally how it works in all paradox games.
It's not about that. It's about investing money in a company who gives me products I enjoy. When I don't like a product, I don't buy it. I've skipped many of the Stellaris DLCs. When I do like a product, I buy it. The more people agree with me, the more encouraged they are to reinvest the profit in new content of its like. If not so many people agree with me, sucks to be me.
And thus the symbiosis of producer and consumer continues on.