Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Either way I think that's purely by intent. In CK2 there was no Confederate Succession, so the Tribals could make stupidly massive empires that just got in the way of everything without being cool or anything. Stretched from Norway to Kiev, yikes.
They were usually led by impossibly long-living degenerates who somehow kept stable land.
Believe me I'm sure someone could make a mod for you, but it's a terrible idea trust me ;)
Also on a sidenote, don't we have enough to worry about? Hungary and Poland always get sucked up by the Germans or the Byzantines. We definitely don't need a super Scandinavia ;)
oh okay i never played CK2 this is my first CK game it just mainly a problem with tribal factions but i see where you coming from it might be to op
That's historically accurate, although a bit early.
There probably should be a few unique inheritance laws for Tribal societies in the game but the way it is now, there just wont be a big tribal empire being formed by the AI, actually, all the big end game empires are usually of player origin or were there from the start.