Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
you can win a battle that is 100 000 strong vs 10 000 strong with no problem. if the 100k army is like 95% levies then its really bad and they just die really fast.
its like having a huge army of level 1 fight fight vs a small army of level 100.
its not just about the number but also what men at arms counters what men at arms and also the knights matter alot aswell along with how good your leader is.
A properly build up MaA army will stackwipe ANY amount of levies.
This was only HALF of my MaA and nowhere near fully maximised in combat potencial
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=3224799375
Incidentally this makes cultures with powerful men at arms such as vikings even more powerful then they were before. Stacking at tribal level huscarls and varangian veterans with war camps and rank 2 war camps allows you to conquer huge realms with much smaller force, causing scenarios that are just clown shoes ridiculous when you think about it for half a second. Like vikings getting off a single boat and conquering the byzantine empire in the 900s