安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
讨论规则及指引
举报此帖
About your recommendations sorry but I play this game because I like history and I don't know about you but having a 11 to 14th century France with Elective Sucession is a sin to my eyes I could never ignore.
I also recommend you read mb3 answer and see the perfect example he just gave
That is usually the result of cultural succession law. You have to puzzle out how the inheritance will fall if it is based on popularity, or prestige, or power instead of strict familial lineage. Is also the reason why HRE looks like a crazy patchwork of rebellions every time they die - which also can be fun to play.
Imagine playing Urraca Countess of Zamora. You marry some lowborn guy. you have a child and then Urraca dies. The heir is now the lowborn father, and not the child's uncles Sancho or Alfonso
Lol well..,
You married matrineally but you are probably under only male inheritance law. Unless there are a only living female, the next closest male kin will get the title.
This wouldnt happen if your succession law was equal rights or female-only....
Dont worry you will get mad again once you willingly and naively marry into basque or nubian queens, or setup your child as heir to an elective scandinavian throne.
Sometimes the "heir" showing is jacked, the real way to check the heir on a title is to look at the title itself. So, example that you provided, you look at the duchy title and see the succession of that title AND often, once that was looked at, the actual heir will update on their portrait.
In that case, the title would & does pass both by familial and male preference. Her original heir is her liege (which is where it reverts if you have no heir at all), and her child's father is half of the child's parent - both related AND male. He is the closest male relative to the new ruler. There is no special rule for the inheritance of the duchy, kingdom, or culture.
https://ibb.co/PwXJpKy This link shows a clear example of the issue
Now your probably thinking, that is a 21st century example how do you want to compare it to CK3?
So let's go into history:
Margaret, Queen of Scotland from 1286 to 1290. Inherited Scotland from her mother's father, Alexander III, but died childless shortly after. Her father, the King of Norway had no chance of inheriting Scotland. Instead a civil war broke out between relatives of her grandfather, the mentioned Alexander III of Scotland. In CK3 the King of Norway would get the throne.
Baldwin V, King of Jerusalem from 1185 to 1186. Inherited Jerusalem from his uncle Baldwin IV the Leper, who skipped his sister Sybilla making her son, his nephew, heir directly. Baldwin V died shortly after and Sybilla and her second husband became Queen and King Consort of Jerusalem. In CK3 in Baldwin V death the throne would go to Baldwin V's paternal uncle, an italian count with zero relation to the previous line of monarchs of Jerusalem.
I don't think you totally understood the issue as I described it. Even if the father is dead and only has sisters, HIS sister WILL inherit and not your mother's sister, the one who is from your dynasty and who descends from all your previous character. This issue is not related to gender.
https://ibb.co/PwXJpKy Take a look at this print, it might help you understand what I mean
Btw in paradox wiki it is said:
"If the ruler has no living descendants, the oldest sibling is chosen. If this sibling is dead, a living heir is sought among their descendants in the same manner. If lateral branches provide no candidate, the primary parent* is chosen. If they're dead, a candidate is sought among their siblings, etc.
*the father in a patrilineal marriage, the mother in a matrilineal marriage"
That * is completly false! You can quickly test this as Urraca of Zamora as I said.
And even the * being true wouldnt be enough, titles should follow their rightful line! Above I gave to historical examples I recommend you to read if you wish.
I'm not suggesting how it should be, that is personal preference, I'm just explaining how it is... by default at the simplest level... unless you change something... to make it work like you want it to? :) I thought the question was how and why is it doing this, not 'I want it to do something different'.
You can tinker with succession however you would like. Kingdoms, duchies, counties can (and sometimes do) have a patchwork of inheritance laws and structure. How Scotland chooses to pass inheritance shouldn't be the default setting for the Persians or the Vikings. Danelaw isn't universal any more than Visigothic code - but each does shape how inheritance in that culture and area works. Tribal, clan, feudal; exclusive, preferential, equal; the six basic succession types; the cultural quirks and possibilities - make 'em work for you however you'd like in your game.
The quickest way to get to your ideal may be to change preference (equal/preferred) and to house seniority for succession. If you are the head of your house the title will revert to you and you can dole it back out again to whomever you deem worthy. Hybridize a culture if you want the specific inheritance style. Don't forget religion can affect inheritance too. :)
Oh no, I understand how it works, I was just blurting a bit to express how much I personally believe it is a tremendous game breaker.
Look at this example: https://ibb.co/PwXJpKy
Now imagine if that half sister was important in your game (p.e. you had married her or something) Then the mother, the Duchess, dies and the Line of Sucession changes completely and the half sister is removed from the line permenantly. Even if you kill the new Duke, her brother, she wont inherit, but a distant paternal cousin of her brother. If you want her to inherit the brother has to die before the mother, but what if the mother dies suddenly. Well then its bye bye Brittany for the sister.
And in that image example the heir is also breton but it could be basically anyone: a foreign King, a landless irish... everything except the rightful heirs
About changing the game, infortunaly I don't know how to do it ahah. but i reported the issue to paradox maybe I will be fortunate and they will take a look at this issue. What pisses me the most is that in CK2 it worked perfectly right :(
I think CK2 was too limiting with inheritance. Options, I think, are a good thing - you just have to learn how to use them and learn to let the rest of the world choose their own ruler their own way if it is not your land and your house. Not getting the inheritor I want somewhere else in the world is more likely due to their early demise or the death of whoever I am marrying off as it is to the quirks of succession. If they had a claim I think they keep it, you just have to rework your machination or press the claim.
The easiest way to change the game is the debug mode. If how a particular county/duchy/kingdom/empire is doing inheritance bothers you save & edit the hell out of it. Note the game version, when they update you'll have to revert to start that save again if you want to go back and restart there. Google search whatever your particular command need is. Changing a character's culture, a counties culture, a religion for either, or swapping back and forth between active characters isn't hard to do.