Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
The factor to conquer you over his claim is obviously much higher than thinking that you're a great guy.
The same also goes for e.g. murderplots, if the personality or motivation are high enough. So your impatient+deceitful+ambitious son with +100 opinion will still murder you.
A greedy, ambitious character with claims you hold will ALWAYS scheme against you and try to get those lands, no matter how much they "like" you.
Edit:
There is an entry as well in the Wiki for the details.[ck3.paradoxwikis.com]
Your brother has a just claim on your kingdom, so by any means he should try to take it back. The only connection i see with the AI personalities would be "Rationality", which decides how strong his troops/alliances need to be in relation to yours, before he decides to attack.
Its basically as simple as that.
That's definitely an important factor in this case, absolutely. I posted it mostly to explain AI behaviour in general, although if the the brother in question was Content let's say, things would have certainly played differently (like the Denouncing part).
That's actually pretty complex under the hood, sometimes they may go for direct confrontation, sometimes they may go the Intrigue route or not even care at all.
but all that complexity can be wiped out just by getting some of the numbers abit wrong.
If my army bigger than yours, equals war over rules everything else then all that other complexity is wasted.
I played the same start many times and its always the same. If a ruler has high enough stewardship to have space in his domain cap, he will start revoking, possibly be over thrown by the tyranny, if he wins the war, he'll give it away if he realise he cant hold it anyway, then repeat.
If hes not at war and an enemy has more men including his allies plus mercs, than whoever, he'll start a war, if he wins that, he'll start another.
if an ememy has less men but spots someone getting attacked by more men, he'll start a war counting them as his troops. Possibly for even the same title and then end up having to fight the winners.
Ive not seen much intrigue, and not alot that made much sense.
Edit: This is the Faction bit for instance: