Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Historicaly, when Mongols arrived, nobody stood a chance, anywhere they went.
People learned how to deal with them (to some extent) eventually but initialy the invasion was massive.
Fair point. Editted my comment.
Probably but my point here is precisely that they can beat an overpowering empire that outnumbers them (3:1 ratio) only because by the time you raise your troops they've already captured the few counties needed to claim your title. Which makes no sense at all.
𝕿𝖔 𝖙𝖍𝖊 𝕴𝖑𝖑𝖚𝖘𝖙𝖗𝖎𝖔𝖚𝖘 𝖁𝖚𝖕𝖑𝖊𝖘 𝖋𝖊𝖗𝖗𝖎𝖑𝖆𝖙𝖆,
May your fur be ever-fluffed.
1. Define "few". Surely it doesn't take so long to raise your forces... When I was only King of Brittany, I would have to have lost like 6+ counties before my title could be usurped.
2. If this is an unavoidable problem, my advice would be to set a rally point close to the invasion point and raise local levies. Assign to them your second-best commander, ideally one with defensive command traits. These troops can be used to delay sieges until your main force assembles.
I recently won a war against superior numbers like this by delaying their siege long enough for my own to complete, allowing me to secure surrender. If your foe has inferior numbers, it should work all the better.
𝕿𝖔 𝖙𝖍𝖊 𝖁𝖊𝖓𝖊𝖗𝖆𝖇𝖑𝖊 𝖟𝖔𝖗𝖐𝖒𝖆𝖓,
May your spymaster find many secrets, all of them true. (And none of them mine!)
I can't find any evidence of this on short notice. For what it's worth, in my most recent war I didn't notice any particular increase to siege pacing.
in my first full playthrough (starting at 800 till 1450) that i am playing atm i just stated a murder complot as soon as the Khan started to spread. He died after he got 5-6 Empires in India and then his vassals ate the empire form inside.
So a good way to stop that ♥♥♥♥ is to kill him. :D
What I ended up doing was conquering the mongols from within. I basically rebuilt my powerbase in byzantium one dutchy at a time so that I was now a king was considerable influence in the empire. Got in good with the Khan, became regent, married into the family. And then staged a coup. Within a lifetime I now had my former Roman Empire AND the Mongol Empire. My son was even a legitimate heir to both. Made for some interesting roleplay, and with all the mongolian land in the east of the map it may have actually sped things up. I'm glad I didn't give up on the campaign.
But I agree. it's some BS by the mongolians. Had a similar thing happen where they attacked into bohemia, and dismantled the entire HRE and even took my own de jure titles when I was just trying to be a tall duke in germany.
Couldn't you move your troops spawning point so they had time to fill and then move them to the fight? Or is this some event thing.. I've actually never seen the mongol invasion in either game. I typically stop playing around 1100 so maybe there is a mechanic i'm unsure of. Well i did see it once in CKII, but it was nothing and crumbled before it even got to me.
I moved the spawning point as close as possible to them but not directly on the frontline because raising 150k troops need space and sometimes it goes wrong with isolated troops being attacked before they have finished to spawn. Anyway, the speed with which the Mongols are taking over the counties is unstoppable. The worst thing was that it was the fourth invasion attempt and the Khan was already dead, his heir got me.