Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
None of this has all that much to do with actual history, just a romantic perception. I personally find rotting empires a more fun setting then empire building.
Isn't the ancient world full of nations like that though? I mean, nations on their way out. I'm not sure what's so compelling about stagnation and a culture that isn't really very identifiable, at least not to a layman like me.
There are so many more interesting cultures, like the Italian merchant families for one, and that hasn't been included either, yet i barely see any calls for it. It's always 'where's my Byzantine'. It's a mystery to me
Not saying India doesn't have its own interesting history but those are the things you pointed out regarding why you like India. Also Byzantium is near the center of the map, a huge empire with a rich history and it lacks the focus other interesting places like Scandinavia and now Persia and the middle east have gotten.
I'm really liking the new DLC and base game update by the way, Persia might be my new favorite region to play in.
I mean, Byzantium isn't Rome, it's a bit like the difference between Selfridges and Aldi's. It's an inferior shadow of Rome
Lets not forget that it was Byzantium along with the Franks to the west who beat back the Muslim hordes from conquering Europe.
Yeah i probably have a film-like view of history, and not an actual historical one. All i know is Byzantine really bores me, other than the armoured cataphracts (which were a Persian idea anyway i believe?) when it comes to cultural identity, they seem so confused and indistinct.
Greek speaking ex-romans, wearing clothing that belongs to everyone else, that don't conquer like the old empire did, that don't innovate, they just hold on to what they have, stagnating, slowly losing battles and land, They were the tail of the Roman 'dog' no? I just don't get the attraction
However if we keep rooting for the region packs, we can get one possibly. It won't just be Byzantine but the region and of course a conflict of various realms (Hungary, Turks, Mamluks, etc.)
Of course many would want other regions like Africa, India and the steppe, Siberia to get DLC first.
Considering other Egyptian things atm I think you might be very unlucky.
I'd go for Slavic world or india as far as broad regions go.
The Romans adopted armored cavalry and horse archers from the enemies they came into contact with, the Byzantine army was VERY different from the army of the republic of Rome or the imperial army of the late antiquity. Yes they adopted the cataphracts (which is a Greek word to describe them) because they came in contact with Greek Hellenistic kingdoms who used them and later the Parthians who also relied heavily on cavalry. But the idea to use heavily armored cavalry was originally from the Persians.