Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
De witte committed suicide after the wallenstein command of the army ended.
Wallenstein was assasinated, and charles of lichtenstein died in 1627 can't find how.
It was in the 30 years war period and your ancestors was greeted land from protestant bohemian noble.
It's interesting you mention the "long coin" method because for me it's the focus point of why things goes bad.
I'm not historian, but if somebody have some access to austrian archive, he should investigate this.
Anyway after some search the amount of money they got from 1622-23 helped them to be rich by a time everyone suffered a big inflation.
The fate of Bassevi is maybe more link to what they did during the mint, more than the fact he was jewish.
It goes a lot deeper than that. He was actually in the service of the Emperor of the HRE. You can probably find a lot of info on the situation if you do some digging.
I will search for books about that in a near future for sure.
The Main question i have without any answers is if the devaluation was an initiative from the consortium or an imperial order.
It could make sense for the fate of Bassevi, de Witte and Wallenstein are another storries from their own
This distinction has never been used in English. There are different groups of Jews or Jewish people (interchangeable) such as Ashkenazi, Mizrahi, Sephardi, and Beta Israel. All Jews, all Jewish.
All i'm saying is the "Jewish" adopted the religion practices and cultures over time while the "Jews/Hebrews" were Davids and the 12 tribe's of Israel actual decedents through bloodline, who often converted to christianity, catholic or muslim some even became pagans. Being Jewish is a religion who anyone can practice while being a Jew/Hebrew is a heritage or decendance in which you are born into. In other words being "Jewish" is a Religion and being a "Jew" is a race. Its similiar to how people confuse being "Islamic" and being a "Arab".
In modern times it's different Jewish can mean either but back then being a "Jew" and being "Jewish" were completely different.
My source is that I was a Jewish history teacher. But, of course, if you want hard sources, I am happy to provide them!
Yeah, this isn't even marginally true. Jews adopted Hellenistic, Roman, Christian, and Zoroastrian, and Muslim Gods due to to the violence of occupations of the Kingdom of Israel, Kingdom of Judah, and Kingdom of Samaria by the Seleucids, Romans/ Byzantines, and multiple Islamic empires. Jews historically notoriously do not convert en mass, with very very few exceptions.
One thing that is unfortunately very ahistorical about CK3 actually is that there is no historical or archaeological evidence that there was a mass conversion of Khazar populations at any point to a regional interpretation of Judaism; it's generally understood as an urban legend.
Jews neither evangelize nor allow easy conversion and all Jewish populations worldwide, whether with history in Ethiopia, Western India, Algeria, or Austria consider themselves Jewish ethno-racially in diaspora regardless of difference in doctrine. This was especially true in the Middle Ages when no one in their right mind would have converted to Judaism, lest you be subjected to Jizya, Pogroms, and regional and financial isolation.
I was a Jewish history teacher and am a Jewish person myself, just for context.
I actually think your Roman understanding of Jews is starting too late in history. Romans had issues with Jews starting in antiquity with the Jewish Wars, mass executions/ crucifixions of Jews across the Judean Province, and the destruction of Jerusalem as well as renaming of the region to Syria Palestina.
Further, most of the Jews who ended up in Rome were taken there as slaves during and after the Jewish=Roman Wars.
Further, Jews in the Holy Roman Empire were restricted to ghettos, one of the most famous being in Venice. Jews were overwhelmingly not permitted to associate with Catholics at all, except in the case of occupations disallowed to Catholicism like money lending.
Unfortunate not so fun fact: Muslims also believe, as described in the Quran, that a Jewish Tribe outside of Mecca conspired to kill Mohammad, and that in retaliation he and his followers killed all of the men and took the women and children as slaves.
They effectively have/had the same grievance as Catholocism, albeit redirected to a new person.
Jews and Jewish were not, and have never been, separate things and have not been considered as such by the Jewish community. Do you have a source?
Jews in Europe, North Africa, The Middle East, Ethiopia, India, and at one point Central Asia, all considered themselves part of the same group in diaspora. It's why Jewish groups in Eastern Europe, the Ottoman Empire, and the Maghreb absorbed Jews from Spain during the Spanish Inquisition and Jews from India absorbed Jews from the Netherlands during similar purges.
Jews are historically endogamous and almost exclusively do not marry out of their own group. It is why all Jewish groups, regardless of region, share genetic markers.
Similarly, Jewish men were never legally allowed to marry or have sex with Muslim women in any Islamic Empire, and Jewish women could be married off only because their children would be considered Muslim. There were multiple major pogroms staged by the Moors in Spain against the Jewish community, by the way.