Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
As consequence if you have play CK2 2000 hours, you will probably forget CK3 after 100 hours.
Regardless of which you choose, you're bound to enjoy your experience with either, but I will say the game of politics and political intrigue is a lot more fun in CK3 than in 2.
Yes, exactly.
Sad but unfortunately true.
this was the question. And the answer ist clearly: same as "CKII+DLC's? no, not now, maybe with mods."
I genuinely think CK3 was designed for people who don't really play the grand strategy genre and would never play any of the other games by PDX. They wanted to attract a demographic who want a laid back casual game that's pick up and play or fun to watch on Youtube.
This is why there's a stark juxtaposition, one side has long time PDX players feeling disgruntled with how barren and boring the game is, the other side is mostly new to PDX and loves the game, because they've never played anything like it before.