Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Yes, you must have 2+ top tier title in order to do this.
So, what's the problem?
In my current playthroug I have 32 kingdom tier titles for myself, +1 is reserved for an heir, who is also a temp holder for vassals that are above vassal limits, and one kingdom vassal, whom I decided to vassalize rather than taking his lands.
I don't like it because all the stars aren't aligned yet so that I can have absolute choice over the heir. And it will take a long time to get there, which means these extra kingdoms get passed around to siblings which always rebel later on. Fewer kingdoms means fewer future rebels. Not to mention fewer, but more powerful vassals means easier to handle them.
Just saying, this can be done on your first generation, starting in 890 (earlest possible date), with tribal ruler (no access to feudal elective), with culture without access to culture elective succession (no access to scandinavian elective), with unreformed pagan faith (faith will be reformed, not a convert to cristianity). So it really doesn't take long.
PS: btw, about those 32 kingdome title, the year is 1099, so I don't have access to any other forms of successtion law other than partition (aside from feudal elective, obsly).
Elections only make it more unstable...
Anyway, you didn't answer my question. My question was if I can delete those two kingdoms land so they go back to Sweden and Norway.
2. You can destroy title and reintegrate duchies into kingdomes, and kingdomes into empires. Will take ltrly ages.
3. You have zero reasons to do so in the first place.
4. You DON'T need heraldy in order to have absolute control over succession
5. You don't even need Royal prerogative in order to have absolute control over succession.
6. If you aren't reading what you've been wrote, how are you expecting to know something? Should I somehow mindf- you and leave that knowledge inside your skull?
The requirements to form a kingdom are
A) Hold more than 50% of the de-jure land and
B) Have at least 2 duchy-level titles.
So you should prevent those two things from happening. With the right Crown Authority (requires tech) vassals can't wage internal wars without using a Hook on you, but even without that you can try to create weak vassals (1 county each) and demand they end vassal wars.
Not exactly a surefire plan, so you're in a pickle there, bud...
Can be avoided.
https://imgur.com/PQlU2CR
Confederate partition, 1098, 30+ children, no titles lost on succession. Note that there is no "designtated hier".
Yes, I forgot to mention needing to get rid of Confederate Partition.
But if OPs game has gone on for "a couple hundred years" then that should no longer be an issue, right?
If you've read MY comments you should understand by know that I've destroyed the titles and i've even waited the 90 years for the De Jure drift to run its course, yet the territory still remains and anyone can re-create those kingdoms if they happen to own the majority of it.
I thought after De Jure drift finished, they would disappear but they don't. May be bug, i don't know.
Point #2. I'm done with you, you're hopeless.
Oh you mean you won't spam my post anymore with your pointless off-topic drivel? How fortuitous, maybe someone who actually knows something will reply instead.
Besides, personaly holding 50% of 2 kingdoms will most likely put you above domain and 2 duches limit. And micromanaging inheritance to avoid vassal collecting enough land is pain in the arse.
You will need to manage vassals if you do not want them forming the kingdoms after you destroy the titles, or having them inherited by siblings. Vassal management is like 90% of the difficulty in this game, if you are not cheesing or map painting. Hold those counties yourself so they can not be used by the AI to form the kingdoms. I also like to put vassals on forced partition if I can, that way their lands explode every generation regardless of the realms laws, this keeps a single powerful vassal from acquiring lots of power too fast, but if you are not feudal that isn't an option I guess. If you are though,the AI can not comprehend birth control measures, so get a hook on the inheritor, imprison him or just bite the tyranny gain, destroy the title and force partition on them, in a couple generations the former kings family will be dukes with a single county each. Boost the Crown auth up and they can't even wage the wars they need to gain the land to form the kingdom.
You don't really gain anything by having a larger Sweden or Norway, unless you hold all the counties in those Kingdoms, if you can keep those extra kingdoms ♥♥♥♥♥♥ and underdeveloped, and ensure that your successors don't inherit too many counties in them, it shouldn't be an too much of an issue to deal with any rebellions or factions tbh.
lmao. Burn.
So you're saying there is no way of undoing the mistake I made when I formed the new kingdom of Bergslagen?
I simply shouldn't have done that, and the de jure part of Sweden would be about twice its size now...
Well good to keep in mind for future playthroughs then, only form a new kingdom if you don't intend to become emperor... (new, meaning a historically fictional kingdom like Bergslagen)
Seems a bit silly though.