Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
That's the price of playing games without loading screens; there's a lot of front-loading going on to ensure everything is seemless. Effectively, the devs have actually already done as much HDD optimization as possible. If that's not good enough for you, it's time to upgrade that dinosaur storage.
More RAM
less Mods
My computer is a prebuilt alienware pc an old model and its warranty has expired for 7+ years. Got this old junk from someone selling it.
I played stellaris and in that game the load times isn't this bad. Its even possible that stellaris is a much bigger game yet runs much more smoother and better than ck3.
If it's still too long, CK3 is very supportive of multiple monitors, and sometimes the best advice is just to open up a video on your phone or second monitor. The in game music can't be better than whatever you usually watch.
SSD are standard equipment for... 10 years now?
The first game which directly relied on an SSD was Diablo III, released in 2012
Basically everything which doesn't fit fully into your RAM, has frequent loading screens, or uses asset streaming, absolutely should be put on an SSD.
Explain to me why would stellaris with all the dlc bs installed still runs faster than ck 3 then?