Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
A more reliable way for me was to imprison them and execute. That way you get bad opinion because of tyrany though.
I guess you don't have access to "Take the vows" since you are tribal. It would be an option without killing involved when negotiating release after imprisoning.
Usually thats the best way to do it
- The wiki obviously talks about Feudal Elections which are indeed limited to Feudal rulers. Scandinavian, Tanistry and Saxon Elections are not limited to Feudal Rulers. From personal experience.
- 867 Alba and any Norse Kingdom are tribal and has access to Saxon Elections and Scandinavian elections, accordingly.
- There's no reason to pick any other election method besides Feudal Election unless you're tribal.
- I always go for elections as soon as my realm is large enough since it's the only way to choose a heir for multiple titles without mass murder/disinherit and without absolute crown authority.
Other ways to handle this is for example if your religion does not have Monasticism for take the vows, you can reform it to have it. Then imprison the heirs you do not want, and force them to take vows on condition of release. Or raise the younger ones under learning since they are more likely to accept taking vows.
Alternative to imprison and execute, is the imprison then Torture. Since those combine give a fairly major health penalty which can result in them dying naturally due to poor health.
Or if you are certain cultures, you can castrate the heir which stops them for inheriting.
Eh... No it’s not. I came here to grow my dynasty and take some land along the way.
I didn’t come here to play “Murder All of My Sons Simulator.”
Because the problem right now, there is not way to understand how each land go to whom. I think it will be rally nice a big update, or expansion giving the player more control of what you want to do before the character dies. In that case it would be really fun, because you will have to role play around what you want and what the AI wants.
The problem is : confederate partition makes no sense. It just create an event that does not make sense. Partition is annoying mostly because I don't understand how the AI divides your lands, and High Partition, is not a problem for me.
Another method is to take the Learning lifestyle, go down the left most tree (Whole of Body), until you unlock Restraint where you can go Celibate. Just don't host too many Feasts because if you get Reveller, you can't go Celibate. At least this way if you've got the son you want, then go Celibate and all is good.
1) If your religion has holy orders you can send extra heirs to a holy order to disinherit them.
2) If your religion has monasticism tenet you can make extra heirs take monk vows to disinherit them.
3) If your religion has theocratic clergy with temporal clerical appointment you can make one of your heirs court chaplain to disinherit them.
4) If you have less daughters than sons you can reform into an equal or female dominated religion and use female preference inheritance.
5) If your realm is going to split on succession you can make sure to have some cash stocked up to press claims on the breakaway realms with your heir.
6) If your realm is not going to be split on succession but you would lose most of your personal domain to secondary heirs you can pre-grant them duchies (or kingdoms if you are an emperor) outside of your personal domain to keep the core lands for your main heir.
And for your next character you can just make sure to not have as many heirs either by:
a) adopting celibacy after one or two children,
b) divorcing and not re-marrying after one or two children
c.1) marrying older women close to infertility (if playing as a male ruler),
c.2) postponing marriage until you are older (if playing as a female ruler),
or d) not marrying at all and instead using lovers and legitimized bastards to create heirs.
There are a LOT of ways to deal with partition succession, and partition is an integral part of the game. It's a feature not a bug.
That being said there is no wrong way to play a game like CK3 and if modding partition out makes it more enjoyable for you that is totally valid.