Steam installieren
Anmelden
|
Sprache
简体中文 (Vereinfachtes Chinesisch)
繁體中文 (Traditionelles Chinesisch)
日本語 (Japanisch)
한국어 (Koreanisch)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarisch)
Čeština (Tschechisch)
Dansk (Dänisch)
English (Englisch)
Español – España (Spanisch – Spanien)
Español – Latinoamérica (Lateinamerikanisches Spanisch)
Ελληνικά (Griechisch)
Français (Französisch)
Italiano (Italienisch)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesisch)
Magyar (Ungarisch)
Nederlands (Niederländisch)
Norsk (Norwegisch)
Polski (Polnisch)
Português – Portugal (Portugiesisch – Portugal)
Português – Brasil (Portugiesisch – Brasilien)
Română (Rumänisch)
Русский (Russisch)
Suomi (Finnisch)
Svenska (Schwedisch)
Türkçe (Türkisch)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamesisch)
Українська (Ukrainisch)
Ein Übersetzungsproblem melden
Their event troops don't replenish though, so they will get weaker over time and if they don't make significant progress very early then they'll end up being fairly small and only a minor power.
Playing as Alfred I start by grabbing all of the Wessex de-jure lands I can (while still a vassal). I ignore the vikings who will generally settle for East Anglia, Northumbria and the Yorvik area.
It's easier to conquer England if the pagans hold a lot of land; the worst thing that can happen is that they convert to Christianity.
Alternatively, a marriage alliance with west Frankia and calling them into the war...
The 1066 start with England is far harder to win (seems Paradox don't want the English to have an easy start; it's probably a brexit revenge thing :) )
So light infantry, I presume? I haven't seen the Danelaw yet, but I'm guessing most of the special troops will be Huscarls.
Although after a few months (or years?) of play I did receive a bonus of 100 light troops (the worst Norse kind, they now have 3 types of light troops).
Then fight them on rough ground, got it. I suspect OP's Danelaw either had truly exceptional champions, or they had a ton of levies and were using sheer numbers to sweep their enemies asunder. The 4k-6k claim does reinforce this.
The great heathen army was OP thats why they killed off most the kings in great britain at the time.
and as for england being too hard in the 1066 start of course it was... they had norway and scotland invading in the north and the normans from the south the anglo saxon kindgom of enlgand was no match for the normans much less them and the northern threat.
as for the starting troops they get ya 5k levies are nice but yorvik and the isls are hostle and sometimes fight right off the bat, they can get passed down but they are garbage troops and they never replinish so when that 5k dies they are gone and never coming back.
Yes it is.
The Norman Conquest of England was an arrow in the eye fluke. The hardly outmatched Anglo Saxons easily dealt with the Norwegian invasion in the North but made the catastrophic mistake of immediately marching on the Normans. In the process losing the bulk of their army to fatigue after the long march North and the even longer march to the South.
Had they just regrouped in London the History of the world would have been re-written. Harold's own fault.
Still it's all if's and but's.
The much earlier great heathen army achieved remarkable success in holding onto land in the British isles, when wikinga of the time were prone to return home to share their loot.
This game does a fair representation of both invasions at the very start; but the AI and player superiority changes history very easily.