Steamをインストール
ログイン
|
言語
简体中文(簡体字中国語)
繁體中文(繁体字中国語)
한국어 (韓国語)
ไทย (タイ語)
български (ブルガリア語)
Čeština(チェコ語)
Dansk (デンマーク語)
Deutsch (ドイツ語)
English (英語)
Español - España (スペイン語 - スペイン)
Español - Latinoamérica (スペイン語 - ラテンアメリカ)
Ελληνικά (ギリシャ語)
Français (フランス語)
Italiano (イタリア語)
Bahasa Indonesia(インドネシア語)
Magyar(ハンガリー語)
Nederlands (オランダ語)
Norsk (ノルウェー語)
Polski (ポーランド語)
Português(ポルトガル語-ポルトガル)
Português - Brasil (ポルトガル語 - ブラジル)
Română(ルーマニア語)
Русский (ロシア語)
Suomi (フィンランド語)
Svenska (スウェーデン語)
Türkçe (トルコ語)
Tiếng Việt (ベトナム語)
Українська (ウクライナ語)
翻訳の問題を報告
This game doesn't have day 1 dlc. And it's totally normal to start working on an expansion as soon as the game is out. What could possibly be wrong with that?
If you have not purchased the game, why are you so "animated" about CK3 business practices since you have not personally evaluated the value of the product?
Personally, with all of my different hobbies, I cannot find a better deal per hour of entertainment.
So far, with the Royal Edition purchased, it has has cost me 59 cents per hour of entertainment.
Likewise, if I rent a movie; and being generous with the movie being three hours long, it is one dollar per hour of entertainment at a minimum in most cases.
For games like CK3, it normally generates a lot of hours of game play and the "price of admission" is worth it per hour of entertainment.
This seems like a form of capitalism to me; otherwise, the business model would go under sooner or later - monopoly or not.