Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
The Netflix adaptation “Cursed” is probably as accurate as any of the other stories about him.
Later on there's another unique decision "Reclaim Britannia" which gives the nickname "the Pendragon" to the ruler who fired that decision. Guess that would be the main goal to work towards.
perhaps somewhere along the road you'll also start your own branch of christianity, though it probably would be easier to stick with catholic or use insular christianity.
So the only mainland cultures that would be ruled out are the Picts and Norse.
Religion is a bit trickier. The Celtic religion is represented by Insular Christianity while the Saxons would be Catholic, but the distinctions are retroactive; for much of the period there's no real sense of distinction between the two, and whether a ruler's religious head came from Rome or Iona tended to be more a matter of prestige or politics than anything doctrinal.
Really the distinction wouldn't matter prior to the mission from Rome to convert the Saxons of Wessex in the 7th Century, around two centuries after Arthur's death. Assuming a 9th century start you'd therefore have a free hand to pick between the two Christian religions since it would largely depend on whether his descendants had stuck with the native traditions or went with the glitz and glamour of Rome in the intervening centuries.
Succession laws would be equally up in the air. Assuming you go with a King Arthur interpretation Britain at the time would be closest to a tribal society (rule by the best armed), though going by the legend Arthur himself was nominated by receiving Excalibur, which isn't really a succession type in the game :P Again, you'd just need to figure out yourself what would have become of his family in the four centuries after his death.
This looks like it would indeed be a good focus to start out with
Yeah he's right there, next to Harry Potter and Mickey Mouse.
We almost know for sure that there were more rulers contributing to the Arthurian legend but
H. Potter and the big mouse himself?
Consider, my mind blown.
Joking aside, absence of proof does not equal proof of absence.
I have always been in the understanding Arthur was Celtic, hence my question about Ghaulic (which I probably keep for my Merlin) and, if I am right, most of the claims come from Brettons (in which I simply combine them all).
The Christianisation of the story was something I have always contributed to the (Christian) monks writing down the legend(s).
I do want to thank you for sharing these bits of info on the subject.
Fortunately, science does not work that way.
You make a claim, then it is your job to substantiate it with verifiable facts. Otherwise the claim is entirely irrelevant.
In this case, King Arthur's existence is fiction unless you can prove it.