Byzantium ( Basilea Romaioi)

[Joe]

There will be dlc to simulate the historical political system of the eastern roman empire? I mean i played the game in a freinds accoutn and i feel the stability is good (finally no more factions, the real problems of byzantium were the external enemis like arabs sasanids, selyuks, bulgarians, cumanians, normands).

The problem in ck2 is the rebellions, its ridiculous. They happened due to the military disasters.


Also why there are so few soldiers? i mean the byzantine empire were more than 30k, in the manzikert there weere 80 k soldiers

[EpirusWarriorμολὼνλαβέ]

So far is not that bad, I would also request a mod.

[Heraclius Caesar]

whatever we do friends, lets not do or say anything that will encourage pdx to tinker with byzantium like they did with holy fury dlc. they have a stable start, succession is good. lets leave it at that.

[EpirusWarriorμολὼνλαβέ]

Originally posted by Heraclius Caesar:

whatever we do friends, lets not do or say anything that will encourage pdx to tinker with byzantium like they did with holy fury dlc. they have a stable start, succession is good. lets leave it at that.

I think they learned from CK2, the game is bit more refined.

[Joe]

Originally posted by αετός ΣΣ Taulantii:

Originally posted by Heraclius Caesar:

whatever we do friends, lets not do or say anything that will encourage pdx to tinker with byzantium like they did with holy fury dlc. they have a stable start, succession is good. lets leave it at that.

I think they learned from CK2, the game is bit more refined.

Yes i am sayiing the stabilty is fine, jsut taht we need more historical inmersion (no feudal system in byz and more troops and almost all realms, make enemie slike bulgarias arabas and others attacks more often byz to not let them not get op. And that to have a bad heir or emperor wiht very bad traits will encourage rebellions .

Sorry for my bad english guys