安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
Now there you can disband and rally troops within a few days or weeks at any location, it seems a bit unnecessary.
You must disband your troops before declaring war. It is a balance feature.
Standing armies didn't really exist in the middle ages, not to the extent they do now or in the renaissance anyways. Instead armies consisted of levies, who were called to arms in a time of need instead of being on the payroll all-year around.
Going to war in CK3 goes like this: Have no armies raised -> Make sure you have a rally point to call your troops to -> Declare war on a ruler you have a CB on -> Raise your troops to the rally point(s) -> Do battle.
It is weird but I understand a little better why it works this way.
Thanks for the answers.
I imagine the poor levies.
Levie : Disbanded ! I can go home to find my wife and my son ! At least.
* 2 monthes later *
Levie : Honey I'm home and I'm here to st...
Wife : Our lord declared a war three days ago! What are you doing here? You should have left home 2 days ago!
Levie : OK ... Bye, see you in a few years.
Já, thats the beauty of serfdom, everyone is literally your slaves. Unless your a viking in that case levies are chads looking for new farmlands and following 10 ten ways to make easy money guides.
If your in a position where its fine to declare a second war then it usually means that you can safely disband your levies and raise them again without distrupting the war effect too much.
.. thanks .. I am new tot he game and was going nuts trying to figure out why I could not attack .. and fwiw .. idiotic rule .. making folks play with "kids gloves" to be "nice" when that is absolutely not how it works in real life or int he game vs raiders .. forcing player to be "peewee hermans" is idiotic .. I should be able to have a standing army that I can use at any time without all the "fake protocols" .. seriously ..
.. so any modder want to hook us all up? .. lol .. I already gave up on the game in "vanilla" to get achievements (thanks obsidi-ain't) ..
You could even march up to the enemy's capitol in peace time, surround their palace, and then declare war. Here's the catch: doing so would cost a heavy amount of Honour, which was a resource in the game. If you had enough Honour, you could spend it and make your attack. If you lacked Honour, you were forced to commit seppuku, ritual suicide. This proved to be a problem, as the actual gamer was required to kill themself. After a few dozen of these, Paradox realized that this could hurt sales of future games and so patched out this content.
No, kidding, of course. But seppuku generally wrecked your game. On the other hand, the surprise attacks didn't work very well, either. What ended up happening was Realm Divide, which was basically Kill All Humans mode. The AI would simply allow all of the computer-controlled states to ally against the human player and steamroller them.
So even though you could declare war while having armies raised, doing so tended to set into motion a massive army reformation that came back to kill the human player. Sengoku was interesting, but unbalanced.