Crusader Kings III

Crusader Kings III

View Stats:
EM Tactics Sep 3, 2020 @ 7:06am
Ck3 Succession is restrictive and bad
Good luck playing in 867 when it takes 200 years to get senority and 400 to get primogeniture,
enjoy gavelkind.
< >
Showing 1-15 of 312 comments
Crim Sep 3, 2020 @ 7:08am 
I do enjoy gavelkind
domuka Sep 3, 2020 @ 7:09am 
dont have the game yet, but wasnt that how CK2 was? just kill off every male except your chosen son!
Last edited by domuka; Sep 3, 2020 @ 7:10am
Bordric Sep 3, 2020 @ 7:09am 
Not difficult to get around.
galadon3 Sep 3, 2020 @ 7:12am 
Originally posted by domuka:
dont have the game yet, but wasnt that how CK2 was? just kill off every male except your chosen son!

in ck2 you could get rid of gavelkind rather quickly, but ck3 has no tech-system that deserves the name and primogeniture has an additional hard lock in that it needs a tech that flat out can't be discovered before the year 1200
Markus Reese Sep 3, 2020 @ 7:14am 
The unverified question I havent been able to test is, what happens if your son marries out of family to take wife's name. Does that preserve succession still? Some prince now in germanic lands ireland?
Mikune Folf Sep 3, 2020 @ 7:17am 
You can disinherit your heirs. Therefore you get instant primogeniture at the start of the game, you just have to pay renown for it and a massive relations hit with the disinherited person. There are so many ways to make sure you don't lose land from your realm. Don't make more than one high title, so if you're a duke - just have one duchy. If you're a king, one kingdom and so on. I waited until I was probably near death, tried not to have too many wives etc. and then disinherited the worst sons before I died so I could choose which heir I wanted.
Last edited by Mikune Folf; Sep 3, 2020 @ 7:18am
domuka Sep 3, 2020 @ 7:17am 
Originally posted by galadon3:

in ck2 you could get rid of gavelkind rather quickly, but ck3 has no tech-system that deserves the name and primogeniture has an additional hard lock in that it needs a tech that flat out can't be discovered before the year 1200
I never ran with Primo. Seniority could get you rich in CK2, dynastic members liked you more, plus the war cool down was gone every succession. I used to paint the whole map my colors within 300 years due to Seniority. So long as thats still around, Seniority still beats primo and is what OP might wanna go for
AeroEngine Sep 3, 2020 @ 7:19am 
Originally posted by Mikune Folf:
You can disinherit your heirs. Therefore you get instant primogeniture at the start of the game, you just have to pay renown for it and a massive relations hit with the disinherited person. There are so many ways to make sure you don't lose land from your realm. Don't make more than one high title, so if you're a duke - just have one duchy. If you're a king, one kingdom and so on.


Yes, but sometimes with the viking inheritance law, the game creates the extra titles and gives them out. So except disinherting you don't have much choice there
vexzi Sep 3, 2020 @ 7:20am 
A yes, primogeniture the lazy mans succession, I get your frustration. But tech is not the only way to change succession laws, you can get elective tanistry very easily. Primogeniture isn't even that good..... just makes things easier to manage for people with less experience or people who aren't interested in managing that part of the game.
Sudo Sep 3, 2020 @ 7:26am 
you just don't know how to play with the gavelkind.

there are two ways that you can get around with it:

you can marry with only 1 woman and force your spare children to become knights so that they can die on the battlefield or you can marry with a woman who has 45+ age and make children by seducing your courtiers.

the second way is pretty smooth and it's a lot better than Primo.
Sol Sep 3, 2020 @ 7:26am 
I usually went the route of Norse Pagan Republics in CK2. I wish there were more succession options available earlier.
Supply Slut Sep 3, 2020 @ 7:27am 
I started as a viking count in 867 and realize I'm basically stuck with some form of gavelkind for at least 150 years, and thats if everything else goes right for me. Feels better TBH, after more than 1000 hours in CK2, as a viking, depending on age, I was usually able to unite the major norse lands, reform the religion, go feudal, and change law to almost whatever I wanted. I loved it, but now that I'm hitting major roadblocks in CK3, it feels right. The old way just felt gamey and easy by comparison. I'm struggling just to get to duchy title, and raiding is no longer the near risk free adventure it was. If you want to do the early viking empire with reformed faith and any succession, I'm sure its still possible with console commands, or if you wait a few weeks maybe a mod will come out to change this.
EM Tactics Sep 3, 2020 @ 7:32am 
Guy's what i'm saying here is that you have no choice, gavelkind is the only way and it just feels way too restrictive and puts your cultural development on rails
EM Tactics Sep 3, 2020 @ 7:35am 
Dude, the byzantine empire is Gavelkind ffs. It's wrong on so many levels
< >
Showing 1-15 of 312 comments
Per page: 1530 50

Date Posted: Sep 3, 2020 @ 7:06am
Posts: 312