Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
You might find info on it on ck wiki.
EDIT : Converting to pre-existing culture can also put your technology ahead of what your current one is.
Wait till you get out of tribalism, then convert.
As for if you should convert or not at all - you, most likely will not be norse culture head as ruler of russian lands, even if you convert all your counties to norse.
Is scandinavian elective succession laws important right from the start or can I wait till my ruler is a bit older and I have more ressources?
1. You form Kingdom of Novgorod.
2. You change your succession law to elective
3. Switch to Russian culture. You still keep elective succession law.
Intended or a bug, I don't know.
Rurik is >THE< start for the most massive land expansion in the entire game. You get to conquer so much land that you soon won't know where to put all the crowns from the kingdoms you will be creating. And forming the actual Empire of Russia is extremely easy, as long as you stick to the de jure borders. Once you become emperor, you no longer lose land within and around Russia.
Only thing that can cross your plans is Khazaria, but from my experience they tend to shatter in an independence revolt early on (same like Kirghiz etc. all the premade empires are highly unstable)
This is the main reason I can think of.
RP reasons too :D
In which way is scandinavian elective negative when being (in) russia?
You can enable Scandinavian elective law even as tribal government.
I think he meant that having elective law in Russia makes the game too easy, even though I haven't played it with elective law so can't say if it's easier or harder.
Indeed, becoming Russian is a good idea because of this. You may want to stay Asatru as Rurik though, since becoming Slavic would invert the CB costs against local rulers (piety/prestige). Just make sure to educate additional sons to be both Russian + Slavic in either case.
Though of course you should check for a good opportunity to become Orthodox as well.
Can you elaborate where Elective is an advantage is Russia?
This is only good for realms which are lacking expansion options. Rurik and his followers have zero problems conquering several kingdoms in each of their lifetime, and should any be lost from confederate partition, it is extremely easy to get them back.
I didn't say it is an advantage, I was referring to your previous post and I thought that's what you meant lol.
Also having to pay piety for conquest instead of prestige is not such a big difference. There is always enough of both unless you go conquest chaining.
Edit: Forgot to mention that you pay piety if you go to war against nations of Slavic religion. Against other religions it's prestige.