Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
But yeah, pricing is going to be highly dependent on what is 'remastered'. If we're just talking about a 2160p60 quality mode, for the console, then I don't see how that's worth more than 10-20 bucks. And thats being generous. PC can already handle that easily. But a ray traced mode, with featuresets that flex current gen hardware? Redoing all the . . . substandard facial animations for NPCs, etc, that could justify a higher price tag.
I'm not saying they're going to do this, I'm just referencing the fact games like The Witcher 3 and the Resident Evil games did it this way and the original versions weren't deleted.
I ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ hate today's "gaming standards".
A remaster has never been part of 'fixes that games received for free', not in the past, not in the present, and won't be in the future either. The entitlement and hubris of some is crazy these days.