Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
The problem is they didn't get a kid to play the kid or do the facial model.
They made the face in some 3d software and used an adult woman for motion capture the rigging. This'd be her.
https://www.imdb.com/name/nm3708833/?ref_=ttfc_fc_cl_t179
I'm not sure where you got this "graphics engines can't model childrens heads" ♥♥♥♥, but, holy god is it wrong.
I'd rather they created this image of a child from an adult actor rather than none at all (as the only other alternative), so i'm not complaining about it.
They COULD get someone. They just didn't. Probably because kids are a pain to work with.
Your scum comment, where you ignore part of my post and then wrote exactly same thing is quite low.
You were wrong.
Protects doesn't mean they don't exist.
But those laws don't protect children from being child actors. It's possible you never watched a film or TV series in your life, so I'll assure you: those kids on screen aren't adult dwarfs.
It's true they can't work after 10 PM, though, no more than 8 hours a day, and no more than 48 hours per week.
https://tophollywoodactingcoach.com/2012/08/work-hours-for-minors-in-the-entertainment-business-2/