Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
It's going to take a lot more optimization patches before we get there.
As for your question, I've just finished my first casual playthrough of 70 hours and I crashed 3 times in total, first 2 times after 50 hours.
The game runs really well apart from some heavy combat scenes where fps drops a bit.
I tried medium settings overall and it ran super smooth. (60 to 80fps)
1070 + 7600k
I dont care for 4K im all about framerates. So i hope ill be able to pull it off.
7700k, RTX 3080 and 32gb ram. @ 3440x1440p (70-90fps) Ultimate Settings + HRD1000 on
Yes, let them 'optimize' the game further so that some rando on the internet gets his frames rendered at 144fps. Draw distance, AA and whatnot already looks like sh#t. Let them 'optimize' further!
How about you get some mobile phone emulator and play frikkin mobile games at 1444fps on your rig. Or make a mod for HZD to replace every tree with a white untextured cube? That would give 14444fps...
Except the difference between 60 to 144 is significant.
You can definitely see the difference or at least feel it whilst playing.
This whole argument about "human eye cannot see beyond 60fps" is old and just not true.
Also I'm probably feeding into a troll post but whatever lol.
This is the dumbest comment i ever got. I can see the diffrence easy between 60 FPS to 144 FPS. It is very noticable. Maybe you need to get you're eyes checked for some glasses. You know you sound like the people who care about content rather then the game being optimized for higher end hardware. You type of people are a serious problem to the gaming indistry an why games like The Division 2, Ghost Recon Breakpoint & Call of Duty run like complete garbage no matter what hardware you have. Becuase yall rush content an the reason we havent had a good game that ran great in the past decade. I'd much rather have a optimized game that can push everything on high settings with no issue's on framerates then get a graphics quality game that has garbage optimization resulting poor performace.
Its sad that Modern Warfare 2 Campaign Remastered can run 240 FPS on a Gaming Laptop like the MSI GP75 Leopard then todays games that cant even push 144 stable at 1080p. Becuase optimization was made not importent. Its all about new content an pretty graphics. No matter how garbage the game runs.
Its true that whole humen eye cant see past 60 FPS is udder bullsh1t. 60 FPS to 144 FPS is very noticable.
And it is because of tech-noob fools like you who yell on the internet for 144fps that HZD has a draw distance where grass basically pops up in front of you and everything flickers.
Go emulate some PS3 game on your PC to reach your useless 144fps if you want 'oooptimization'. I trade in lush visuals any day if it means I can get 'only' 60fps. Thank god devs have actually a few more braincells and just aim at 60fps tops. Go emulate N64 games and leave high end PC games alone. I want to look at some lush and full scenes and high res textures, not some downgraded rubbish to reach nonsense framerates.
Ryzen 7 5800X, 5700XT, 32gb 3200mhz ram.