Nainstalovat Steam
přihlásit se
|
jazyk
简体中文 (Zjednodušená čínština)
繁體中文 (Tradiční čínština)
日本語 (Japonština)
한국어 (Korejština)
ไทย (Thajština)
български (Bulharština)
Dansk (Dánština)
Deutsch (Němčina)
English (Angličtina)
Español-España (Evropská španělština)
Español-Latinoamérica (Latin. španělština)
Ελληνικά (Řečtina)
Français (Francouzština)
Italiano (Italština)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonéština)
Magyar (Maďarština)
Nederlands (Nizozemština)
Norsk (Norština)
Polski (Polština)
Português (Evropská portugalština)
Português-Brasil (Brazilská portugalština)
Română (Rumunština)
Русский (Ruština)
Suomi (Finština)
Svenska (Švédština)
Türkçe (Turečtina)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamština)
Українська (Ukrajinština)
Nahlásit problém s překladem
Only seen that happen on AMD cards, so, it's something on your end.
See previous.
Literally never seen this. Did you turn on adaptive performance fps or something?
Considering your other comments, I'm willing to bet you screwed something up in the settings.
Have really had very few problems with Days Gone, whether with the settings or otherwise. Same pc, no change in cpu etc. Saying its a different engine is just an excuse for how poorly optimized horizon zero dawn really is. Different engine or not if the game was well optimized it would be running just as smooth as days gone on the same pc. What your making is an excuse for a poorly optimized pc port that still needs some working on.
Don’t get me wrong it’s a fantastic game, just could have been a better and more enjoyable experience had it been properly optimized.
Intel i5
They've been making i5 cpus since 2009. They're not all the same.
I may not be a computer expert like you, but I can tell when a pc port has been poorly optimized and even reviews confirm that one game was well optimized while the other wasn’t upon release. All I had to do was watch the digital foundry videos to confirm that for me. And now that I can compare both games, I do see the difference in optimization, as one does run much smoother than the other.
So you've got a dorito for a cpu then. Good to know.
Seriously, you don't need to be an expert to figure out what your cpu is.
PC Settings>System>About.
Not complex.
I'm not saying this game is perfect. It's most definitely not. But your attempt to compare it to a game by different developers on a COMPLETELY different engine because "it's a ps4 port!" is massively uninformed and just flat out the wrong way to look at things.
Honestly, I probably couldn’t have cared less what engine they were each made on. As a gamer all I know is that one runs smoothly and one runs poorly on the same pc (which I will probably need to get rid of at some point).
Kinda makes your opinion on which one runs well moot.
This is because Days Gone uses DirectX 11. DirectX 12, is what uses the advanced shaders and generally needing higher end hardware due to this.
-no problems with textures loading correctly in game with Days Gone
This only happens on low end cards for HZD, especially those with less then 8GB of VRam and setting things too high.
-no control issues (sometimes you run with Alloy and she just doesn’t stop when you stop running)
Never seen this issue, ever. And I've tested it on APU's to high end systems.
-no problems with textures flickering
This is again, GPU connected. If textures are flickering, this means your card can't handle TAA very well or needs to lower settings yet again.
-no cut scenes appearing in incorrect resolution in Days Gone
Wut? All Cutscenes are proper resolution, the only time they are not, is if you use resolution scaling, and again, that means you're using a low end GPU or had adaptive resolution.
-the sad part is that Days Gone even looks better graphically because of the good optimization
I'd have to disagree heavily. I have Days Gone, and the textures are not better resolution. That games textures are so low, I can run 4K at over 70 FPS, max settings, on a card not meant for 4K. Even the mipmapping isn't that high.
Based on what your saying then, Horizon Zero Dawn was only optimized to run well on high end pcs, while Days Gone runs well on a variety of pcs. I think we have a clear winner. If you are Sony you shouldn’t expect every one of your pc customers to have an RTX 3070 or 3080, and a high end pc. I understand your reasoning but at the same time I have high settings on for both HZD and Days Gone and one works well while the other more poorly. To be fair I have tried HZD on the lower end settings and it’s nearly unplayable because of how bad it looks. Days Gone for me on high settings 1440p works smoothly, while HZD on detected settings looks like horse manure. This is why I play it at higher settings. I know you want to defend the game but it is a poor port, and I’m sorry that not everyone is rocking a pc with an RTX 3090 card, an i9 cpu, and rgb series 64 gb ddr 4 ram like yourself. Bottom line Days Gone plays well on a variety of pcs, while HZD doesn’t. Case closed.
You're on an i5 and complaining about performance in a cpu heavy game.
You don't need a 3080/3090 to get good performance out of this game.
Hell, your 1660 will run it fine. If it's not being held back by a garbage cpu, slow ram and a spinning hard drive.
If this is the case you should have a better temporary solution for me other than upgrading my pix at the moment.
And as I’ve mentioned, the settings you recommended to me make the game look awful.
Any other suggestions, I’m open to them.
I’m really here to get a better gaming experience out of the game, and not to argue about why I’m experiencing the issues I’m experiencing. That’s all great, but I would much prefer a solution instead.
Apparently Days Gone which came out almost a year after HZD, doesn’t think my cpu is garbage as it runs just fine on it. You do realize it’s a computer we’re talking about here, not myself. What does an inferiority complex have to do with anything? lol. Your basically trashing my inferior pc which has nothing to do with me lol. It’s just the tool I use to play games, and most run just fine.
And you don't know your computer well enough to know what settings you should use or what its limitations are.
Your i5, as noted by the fact it's using ddr3, is at best a 3000 line. That's a nine year old product.
Combine that with a spinning drive and you've got a massive bottleneck.