What graphics options, fps can I expect on Asus Strix GTX 970, i5 4590, 16 GB RAM DDR3?

[sereK.]

If you play on Asus Strix GTX 970, i5 4590, 16 GB RAM DDR3 please let me know what can I expect when it comes to graphics options and FPS.

As of today, is it to possible to play the game on this rig on stable 60fps?

[Inherited]

low and 30-40 fps lol, the port is bad.

Rtx 2060/i7 9700k on 1440p with original setting only hits 50ish fps. Even on 1080p its barely 60-65.

For reference rdr2 pc port is pretty meh too but that runs 55-75 fps mostly. High almost all settings, few medium.

Worst is, for me atleast, even when I have 60 fps in HZD it feels really laggy for some reason. Don't have that issue in rdr2 or other games.

https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2191222032

Actual gameplay seems to be worse than the benchmark, I've seen as low as 40ish fps.

[GreedyChip]

You will have to run the game on the lowest setting @ 1080P/60fps to be fair a GTX 970 is 6 years old you can't expect to run games on it for ever.

They have improved the quick save so your frames don't drop when you save.

You meet the minimum system requirements. so don't expect it to look like the console version if you want 60fps.

[Bloody Meaty Chunks]

Originally posted by sereK.:

If you play on Asus Strix GTX 970, i5 4590, 16 GB RAM DDR3 please let me know what can I expect when it comes to graphics options and FPS.

As of today, is it to possible to play the game on this rig on stable 60fps?

I GET 60 FPS ON ULTRA

Computer Information:
Manufacturer: LENOVO
Model: 90L300B4AU
Form Factor: Desktop
No Touch Input Detected

Processor Information:
CPU Vendor: GenuineIntel
CPU Brand: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-9400F CPU @ 2.90GHz
CPU Family: 0x6
CPU Model: 0x9e
CPU Stepping: 0xa
CPU Type: 0x0
Speed: 2904 Mhz
6 logical processors
6 physical processors
HyperThreading: Unsupported
FCMOV: Supported
SSE2: Supported
SSE3: Supported
SSSE3: Supported
SSE4a: Unsupported
SSE41: Supported
SSE42: Supported
AES: Supported
AVX: Supported
AVX2: Supported
AVX512F: Unsupported
AVX512PF: Unsupported
AVX512ER: Unsupported
AVX512CD: Unsupported
AVX512VNNI: Unsupported
SHA: Unsupported
CMPXCHG16B: Supported
LAHF/SAHF: Supported
PrefetchW: Unsupported

Operating System Version:
Windows 10 (64 bit)
NTFS: Supported
Crypto Provider Codes: Supported 311 0x0 0x0 0x0

Video Card:
Driver: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
DirectX Driver Name: nvldumd.dll
Driver Version: 27.21.14.5167
DirectX Driver Version: 27.21.14.5167
Driver Date: 7 5 2020
OpenGL Version: 4.6
Desktop Color Depth: 32 bits per pixel
Monitor Refresh Rate: 144 Hz
DirectX Card: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
VendorID: 0x10de
DeviceID: 0x2182
Revision: 0xa1
Number of Monitors: 1
Number of Logical Video Cards: 1
No SLI or Crossfire Detected
Primary Display Resolution: 3620 x 2036
Desktop Resolution: 3620 x 2036
Primary Display Size: 27.17" x 16.89" (31.97" diag)
69.0cm x 42.9cm (81.2cm diag)
Primary Bus: PCI Express 16x
Primary VRAM: 6143 MB
Supported MSAA Modes: 2x 4x 8x

Sound card:
Audio device: Speakers (Realtek(R) Audio)

Memory:
RAM: 32672 Mb

VR Hardware:
VR Headset: None detected

Miscellaneous:
UI Language: English
Media Type: DVD
Total Hard Disk Space Available: 2394708 Mb
Largest Free Hard Disk Block: 655405 Mb
OS Install Date: Jan 01 1970
Game Controller: None detected
MAC Address hash: 3487401fc4570473eb79a7e834f02505419b41cb
Disk serial number hash: 6e7ce56b

[Demesis]

I'm using an i7 6700, GTX 970, 16GB DDR4 on latest Nvidia drivers.Running the game on all medium settings at around 45-50 fps. If I do set everything on "High", it'll be around 40 fps. Don't have much issues on it and no crashes, aside from some mild stutter sometimes, but that's mainly to do with the game's bad optimization. If they can optimize this game better with future patches, I can probably play on higher settings easily.

Though the gtx 970 is starting to show its age, it's still a pretty capable card if you're playing at 1080p. I can still play many of the latest games on "high" settings at a decent fps (Red Dead Redemption 2 on everything "High" at around 50 fps).

However, with that said, your experience may vary with this particular game. I'm pretty lucky to be able to run this game without too much issues, but it may end up running poorly on your system. It's pretty much a gamble.

[fredd_uk]

I play on i5 4690k, gtx 970 and 16gb ram.
The game's detection put everything on medium, at 1080p I have about 40-50 fps, sometimes more.
I got some stuttering and flickering problems. I haven't tried low settings yet.
No crash after about 9 hours of playing.

[Timur]

It's hard to answer unless you check it yourself even people with similar setup get variable performances.

[longjohn119]

Originally posted by Demesis:

I'm using an i7 6700, GTX 970, 16GB DDR4 on latest Nvidia drivers.Running the game on all medium settings at around 45-50 fps. If I do set everything on "High", it'll be around 40 fps. Don't have much issues on it and no crashes, aside from some mild stutter sometimes, but that's mainly to do with the game's bad optimization. If they can optimize this game better with future patches, I can probably play on higher settings easily.

Though the gtx 970 is starting to show its age, it's still a pretty capable card if you're playing at 1080p. I can still play many of the latest games on "high" settings at a decent fps (Red Dead Redemption 2 on everything "High" at around 50 fps).

However, with that said, your experience may vary with this particular game. I'm pretty lucky to be able to run this game without too much issues, but it may end up running poorly on your system. It's pretty much a gamble.

Well the thing about RDR2 is the way they labeled their settings .... High on most settings in RDR2 is like Ultra in most other games and their Ultra is really next gen (RDNA2 Ampere) quality ..... My issues with RDR2 was it was 6 weeks before I could even get past the launcher without crashing 9 of 10 times and then another 4-6 weeks before it stopped crashing ever 45-60 minutes .....

I'm using a RX 5700 (non XT) flashed with an XT BIOS and I didn't have any crashing problems although I haven't played it yet for 3-4 hours straight. I just had low framerates for the graphics quality and some occasional stuttering, mainly in cut scenes but the 1.02 update really cut my framerates even more from 56 down to 40 .... Same quality graphics in RDR2 gets me around 72 and in AC Odyssey 77 although frankly I think both RDR2 and Odyssey actually look bit better environmentally (trees, rocks, grasses, etc.) while this has a little bit better looking PC and NPCs

What it does have in common with RDR2 is it is a great game ruined by a lousy port that simply should not have never been released in the state it was in

[Demesis]

Originally posted by russell_john:

Originally posted by Demesis:

I'm using an i7 6700, GTX 970, 16GB DDR4 on latest Nvidia drivers.Running the game on all medium settings at around 45-50 fps. If I do set everything on "High", it'll be around 40 fps. Don't have much issues on it and no crashes, aside from some mild stutter sometimes, but that's mainly to do with the game's bad optimization. If they can optimize this game better with future patches, I can probably play on higher settings easily.

Though the gtx 970 is starting to show its age, it's still a pretty capable card if you're playing at 1080p. I can still play many of the latest games on "high" settings at a decent fps (Red Dead Redemption 2 on everything "High" at around 50 fps).

However, with that said, your experience may vary with this particular game. I'm pretty lucky to be able to run this game without too much issues, but it may end up running poorly on your system. It's pretty much a gamble.

Well the thing about RDR2 is the way they labeled their settings .... High on most settings in RDR2 is like Ultra in most other games and their Ultra is really next gen (RDNA2 Ampere) quality ..... My issues with RDR2 was it was 6 weeks before I could even get past the launcher without crashing 9 of 10 times and then another 4-6 weeks before it stopped crashing ever 45-60 minutes .....

I'm using a RX 5700 (non XT) flashed with an XT BIOS and I didn't have any crashing problems although I haven't played it yet for 3-4 hours straight. I just had low framerates for the graphics quality and some occasional stuttering, mainly in cut scenes but the 1.02 update really cut my framerates even more from 56 down to 40 .... Same quality graphics in RDR2 gets me around 72 and in AC Odyssey 77 although frankly I think both RDR2 and Odyssey actually look bit better environmentally (trees, rocks, grasses, etc.) while this has a little bit better looking PC and NPCs

What it does have in common with RDR2 is it is a great game ruined by a lousy port that simply should not have never been released in the state it was in

Sorry to hear that man. I had my own issues with RDR2 when it first launched as well, but it was mainly to do with the ♥♥♥♥♥♥ Rockstar Launcher. It would sometimes kick me out of the game when I lost internet connection due to their online drm. Other than that, and some really annoying bugs (weapon loadout randomly changing for no reason), didn't have much problems.

As for Horizon Zero Dawn, yeah, I've been noticing a slight drop in performance with every new patch. My FPS remains about the same, but there seems to be slightly more stuttering here and there. My guess is in their quest to make the game somewhat more stable and prevent crashing, they may have inadvertently caused the game to run worse performance wise. I do hope they can get this sorted out soon, though at this rate, I think I'd probably finish the game before the next patch. LOL. Oh, well.