Sherlock Holmes Chapter One

Sherlock Holmes Chapter One

View Stats:
Let's talk about End Game Conclusions!
So, I finished the game earlier today and LOVED it. I reloaded my checkpoint, so I could experience the four different summations, and I'm pretty comfortable with my first choice being my defacto canon ending for the lore. Let me know what you guys picked, and which fit your play style. Below, I've put my favorite and why I dug it:
I went with the killing off Jon as he manifested Sherlock's darker subconscious. It just felt...appropriate to me. I completed all of Jon's challenges, but they just felt like a child's game. As my imaginary friend, I felt that the logical conclusion to my "coming of age" adventure, was to put aside childish things, and choosing to view him as a sinister alter ego really felt like It felt a great narrative twist. The scene was SO satisfyingly directed and acted. I really FELT that emotion. Really well done. Well done indeed. I also thought the progression into an analytical, empirical approach to his future studies at University went well with the maturation of his character. And boy, that little twitch of Watson's introduction and name drop REALLY sold that loss of Jon. Also, can I just say that I absolutely loved the Vogel/Richter revelation? I mean, yes, I think it was obvious he was a villain from the start, but the last line and the painting was SUPER satisfying.
< >
Showing 1-14 of 14 comments
cryo24 Nov 20, 2021 @ 6:50pm 
In my opinion killing jon makes no sense, I don't think Violet died from the tea, in the flashback before the end, we see sherlock picking the drug that she used every day and it was his idea, not jon's, even then, why would she suddenly get an allergy attack ? Furthermore when you can see Mycroft holding the doc at gunpoint, violet's is covered in blood and sherlock said that was no corrrect tracheotomy.
Wether the doc straight up murdered Violet or is really terrible and can't even do a simple tracheotomy, he was the one that aggravated Violet's mental issues with his "theories".
So the "jon is "evil" " ending, even if really heavy emotionally, can't be the canon conclusion for me, I can't wrap my head around it.
wyndhambarnhill Nov 22, 2021 @ 3:06pm 
Originally posted by cryo24:
In my opinion killing jon makes no sense, I don't think Violet died from the tea, in the flashback before the end, we see sherlock picking the drug that she used every day and it was his idea, not Jon's, even then, why would she suddenly get an allergy attack ? Furthermore when you can see Mycroft holding the doc at gunpoint, violet's is covered in blood and sherlock said that was no corrrect tracheotomy.
Whether the doc straight up murdered Violet or is really terrible and can't even do a simple tracheotomy, he was the one that aggravated Violet's mental issues with his "theories".
So the "jon is "evil" " ending, even if really heavy emotionally, can't be the canon conclusion for me, I can't wrap my head around it.
I totally don't recall any of the blood being seen during the cutscenes, but yea, the doc totally orchestrated if so. Even if not, there was just know reason to perform a tracheotomy if she was drowning. So you're absolutely on the mark about that. Factually, yes, totally agree with you on the details and motives et al. I just ENJOYED the dead-Jon ending more because it was directed and presented better. The Mycroft vengeance angle was just...conveyed flatly and didn't really hold any water, as far as...impact. We see Mycroft, maybe, for 15 seconds in the entire game, and he's presented as the enigmatic a**hole throughout. So, yea....as far as pure entertainment goes, I preferred my choice.
fleur_de_mis Nov 23, 2021 @ 9:29am 
IMO while I liked a lot of the individual scenes that you can see in each of the 4 endings, they aren't granular enough and not all of them make sense with how you may have been playing the game:

  • I ran first with the "sherlock is responsible" ending because it made the most sense to me as a reason why Sherlock/Jon buried this memory in the first place - due to the guilt and not being able to come to terms with it. However, what I thought I would get out of that was a discussion/realization that while he initially buried this memory due to feeling responsible, as an adult seeing the full picture and with Jon/Mycroft's help he is able to realize that there were a lot of complicating factors around his mother's death and he shouldn't have to shoulder the blame all by himself. Instead, I got a bizarre "welp I guess I have to go to jail because I live by hard and fast truth principles" despite the fact that I think I probably let 60% of the murderers I caught go in this game, LOL. Granted I kind of get why you don't want to magically fix all of Sherlock's issues by the end, considering the picture you see of him in the future (and tbh in Doyle's canon if you read between the lines) doesn't really scream mentally healthy individual, but I found this ending pretty bleak.
  • Meanwhile the "Jon is responsible" ending is somehow even more bleak, however in some ways a better explanation for the Holmes you see in the future/canon, because by 'killing' Jon in this scenario it seems he's not only killing the 'darker impulses' but also all the humanity/empathy/kindness that Jon seemed to represent in Sherlock, which is an interesting explanation for his suppress-all-emotions mentality. Additionally, there's some fascinating stuff here bordering on dissociative identity disorder when Jon refers to protecting Sherlock/taking the hits from his mother for him, and this is one of the few times I think Sherlock refers to/views Jon as an aspect of himself rather than an individual unto himself. Kind of wish this was delved into a bit more.
  • Conversely, the 'Otto is responsible' endings ring a bit false because they seem too tidy and don't bring quite the same catharsis, but in both of those endings we get the nice scene of Jon saying goodbye to Sherlock which I think would have been a natural thing to include in any ending. Also, Mycroft gets off pretty easy in both these endings, but I kind of wish we got more of him here, because the more we learned about the past the more I felt sorry for him. He might have a ♥♥♥♥♥♥ way of expressing himself but he seems to genuinely care for his family and being the only lucid adult dealing with an unwell mother and a kid brother getting lost in his own world must have been incredibly trying.
  • Final note, can't really wrap my head around the bit in the 'Mycroft framed Otto' ending where Sherlock is paranoid and has turned into some kind of vigilante disrupting Mycroft's operations?? Not really sure how A leads to B there, lol.

Regarding Vogel: My read on him vacillated a lot throughout my playthrough from weird philosophical sparring partner/mentor, oddball eccentric, to sinister corruptive figure, but I don't see him as a full-blown villain by the end. He really does come across to me like a chaotic, impulsive, provocative figure who was drawn to Sherlock by curiosity to see the kid who got his brother arrested for murder and hung around because it was fun to push his buttons. I don't really think he was deliberately manipulating Sherlock for any sinister end, just constantly pushing him to question his black-and-white worldview and seeing how far he could get Sherlock to bend. All that said, the overall vibe I got from him was what a creep, even occasionally leaning into predatory vibes in some scenes.
Nyarty Nov 24, 2021 @ 10:07am 
My natural and first decision was:
- Otto killed unintentionally
That death caused by the allergy was nosense for me, while the resistence of the medicine was far more realistic. But I don't see why Otto would intentionally kill Violet. Yet Mycroft is not really the type who accuses someone unless he is 100% sure.
I'll now watch all the other endings


About Vogel
I didn't quite understood the paiting... maybe I'll understand watching all the other endings.
Btw I hated him from the first time


OFF topic but I a little disappointed that they didn't aged sherlock for the scene with watson. They met at least when they were in their '30 and while watson appereance seems reasonable, sherlock in the same attire of the game is not correct. Just different clothes, hair and face skin would have been perfect
Last edited by Nyarty; Nov 24, 2021 @ 10:07am
MarkedAsRed Nov 24, 2021 @ 3:44pm 
Originally posted by Nyarty:
My natural and first decision was:
OFF topic but I a little disappointed that they didn't aged sherlock for the scene with watson. They met at least when they were in their '30 and while watson appereance seems reasonable, sherlock in the same attire of the game is not correct. Just different clothes, hair and face skin would have been perfect

Watson had been at war for a few years and was wounded and got shellshocked by the time he met Holmes, who had barely left England until then. Though Holmes wasn't as much a cherub as he's depicted in here, it stands to reason that Watson looks a bit more haggard or at least aged.
fleur_de_mis Nov 24, 2021 @ 11:40pm 
Originally posted by Mirus:
Watson had been at war for a few years and was wounded and got shellshocked by the time he met Holmes, who had barely left England until then. Though Holmes wasn't as much a cherub as he's depicted in here, it stands to reason that Watson looks a bit more haggard or at least aged.

As a side note, the Holmes & Watson introduction scene adapted from A Study in Scarlet was one of my favorite scenes in the game, really liked how the direction and acting drove home the sad reality behind the pithy, very English Victorian dialogue ("Nice to meet you, I have depressive episodes" "Oh that's cool, I have PTSD"). Watson in particular was animated/acted with a quiet, nervous, muted energy that effectively conveyed "just got back from a horrible war" lol.

That said they could have at least put a lab coat (maybe the Scatterbrained Scientist outfit lol) on Sherlock; dude's probably getting blood and chemicals all over his super fancy waistcoat.
nikolaLTP Nov 25, 2021 @ 12:31am 
What about gift picture on end from "you know who" (avoidnig spoilers)
wyndhambarnhill Nov 26, 2021 @ 12:29pm 
Originally posted by nikolaLTP:
What about gift picture on end from "you know who" (avoidnig spoilers)
The picture stays the same, so the only variations on the ending are two scenes:
How you deal with Jon and the conclusion of your Mother's death
and
Depending on the conclusion you chose, the narration (and who) it's given, that explains what Sherry has gone on to do...before the static meeting of Watson
Capt. Pottypie Dec 17, 2021 @ 7:16am 
The end game idea that Otto killed Violet makes little sense since it would explain nothing about the whole tracheostomy. That only makes sense if she was having an allergic reaction.
Re. "Allergic reaction isn't feasible", you have to bear in mind that you can't build up a tolerance to all chemicals. Furthermore, the medicine was dosed by a 10 year old child with no real understanding of said medicine. Is it really so surprising that such a situation will end up with a dangerous dose?
GrimbornWolf Dec 18, 2021 @ 9:04am 
Originally posted by fleur_de_mis:
  • Final note, can't really wrap my head around the bit in the 'Mycroft framed Otto' ending where Sherlock is paranoid and has turned into some kind of vigilante disrupting Mycroft's operations?? Not really sure how A leads to B there, lol.

I chose a different ending and still got the vigilante thing (carriege scene) I think its more connected to how you chose to end the Mycroft related cases. I never played them his way.
harlekinrains Dec 20, 2021 @ 3:17pm 
Originally posted by fleur_de_mis:
IMO while I liked a lot of the individual scenes that you can see in each of the 4 endings, they aren't granular enough and not all of them make sense with how you may have been playing the game:

  • I ran first with the "sherlock is responsible" ending because it made the most sense to me as a reason why Sherlock/Jon buried this memory in the first place - due to the guilt and not being able to come to terms with it. However, what I thought I would get out of that was a discussion/realization that while he initially buried this memory due to feeling responsible, as an adult seeing the full picture and with Jon/Mycroft's help he is able to realize that there were a lot of complicating factors around his mother's death and he shouldn't have to shoulder the blame all by himself. Instead, I got a bizarre "welp I guess I have to go to jail because I live by hard and fast truth principles" despite the fact that I think I probably let 60% of the murderers I caught go in this game, LOL. Granted I kind of get why you don't want to magically fix all of Sherlock's issues by the end, considering the picture you see of him in the future (and tbh in Doyle's canon if you read between the lines) doesn't really scream mentally healthy individual, but I found this ending pretty bleak.
  • Meanwhile the "Jon is responsible" ending is somehow even more bleak, however in some ways a better explanation for the Holmes you see in the future/canon, because by 'killing' Jon in this scenario it seems he's not only killing the 'darker impulses' but also all the humanity/empathy/kindness that Jon seemed to represent in Sherlock, which is an interesting explanation for his suppress-all-emotions mentality. Additionally, there's some fascinating stuff here bordering on dissociative identity disorder when Jon refers to protecting Sherlock/taking the hits from his mother for him, and this is one of the few times I think Sherlock refers to/views Jon as an aspect of himself rather than an individual unto himself. Kind of wish this was delved into a bit more.
  • Conversely, the 'Otto is responsible' endings ring a bit false because they seem too tidy and don't bring quite the same catharsis, but in both of those endings we get the nice scene of Jon saying goodbye to Sherlock which I think would have been a natural thing to include in any ending. Also, Mycroft gets off pretty easy in both these endings, but I kind of wish we got more of him here, because the more we learned about the past the more I felt sorry for him. He might have a ♥♥♥♥♥♥ way of expressing himself but he seems to genuinely care for his family and being the only lucid adult dealing with an unwell mother and a kid brother getting lost in his own world must have been incredibly trying.
  • Final note, can't really wrap my head around the bit in the 'Mycroft framed Otto' ending where Sherlock is paranoid and has turned into some kind of vigilante disrupting Mycroft's operations?? Not really sure how A leads to B there, lol.

Regarding Vogel: My read on him vacillated a lot throughout my playthrough from weird philosophical sparring partner/mentor, oddball eccentric, to sinister corruptive figure, but I don't see him as a full-blown villain by the end. He really does come across to me like a chaotic, impulsive, provocative figure who was drawn to Sherlock by curiosity to see the kid who got his brother arrested for murder and hung around because it was fun to push his buttons. I don't really think he was deliberately manipulating Sherlock for any sinister end, just constantly pushing him to question his black-and-white worldview and seeing how far he could get Sherlock to bend. All that said, the overall vibe I got from him was what a creep, even occasionally leaning into predatory vibes in some scenes.
^This.

Vogel is in part what a psychologist might do, or not.. :) In the end (I also chose your first, in case that matters) he has one quote that stuck in my head. "I took your Sisyphos and made you Ozymandias" followed by "what remains now is if you let yourself be dominated by that or not" (or something similar), "I will now return to another "work"". So essentially what he does is to pull up a mirror, and let Sherlock decide the outcome.

In the case before that, regardless of what you choose (at least in the hang them endings (tested)) he will always tell Sherlock, that he is a trainwreck that will crash, because of internal contradiction, and that he cant wait for it. Thats on the question if a person has free will. To which the intelligent mans answer is no, btw. Not only because of personal and family ties (which Vogel mentions afair), but also because of "ethics programming". On which Vogel then says in one response, that morals and ethics is what happens post facto, and doesnt guide decisions. Never quite heard that school of thought, but its interesting. :)
(Devs should name philosophers.. ;) )

In the gallery case he responds to the question "what theme does the exhibition have" with "it has none - its your interpretation" also in all cases afair. So Rorschach test esentially. But this could be overinterpretation.

In the Eyes wide shut case, he encourages Sherlock to drink and have fun, which any normal person would do (open to interpretation..;) ) which my canonical Sherlock of course refused. :) When you then dont pick the "i want to analyze the champagne" option, you get a response "that that is progress". Again, hinting at a pattern, that could benefit from being disrupted. (I didnt try the other dialogue options in that case.)
Last edited by harlekinrains; Dec 20, 2021 @ 10:48pm
nshady Dec 20, 2021 @ 7:10pm 
Originally posted by harlekinrains:
Originally posted by fleur_de_mis:
IMO while I liked a lot of the individual scenes that you can see in each of the 4 endings, they aren't granular enough and not all of them make sense with how you may have been playing the game:

  • I ran first with the "sherlock is responsible" ending because it made the most sense to me as a reason why Sherlock/Jon buried this memory in the first place - due to the guilt and not being able to come to terms with it. However, what I thought I would get out of that was a discussion/realization that while he initially buried this memory due to feeling responsible, as an adult seeing the full picture and with Jon/Mycroft's help he is able to realize that there were a lot of complicating factors around his mother's death and he shouldn't have to shoulder the blame all by himself. Instead, I got a bizarre "welp I guess I have to go to jail because I live by hard and fast truth principles" despite the fact that I think I probably let 60% of the murderers I caught go in this game, LOL. Granted I kind of get why you don't want to magically fix all of Sherlock's issues by the end, considering the picture you see of him in the future (and tbh in Doyle's canon if you read between the lines) doesn't really scream mentally healthy individual, but I found this ending pretty bleak.
  • Meanwhile the "Jon is responsible" ending is somehow even more bleak, however in some ways a better explanation for the Holmes you see in the future/canon, because by 'killing' Jon in this scenario it seems he's not only killing the 'darker impulses' but also all the humanity/empathy/kindness that Jon seemed to represent in Sherlock, which is an interesting explanation for his suppress-all-emotions mentality. Additionally, there's some fascinating stuff here bordering on dissociative identity disorder when Jon refers to protecting Sherlock/taking the hits from his mother for him, and this is one of the few times I think Sherlock refers to/views Jon as an aspect of himself rather than an individual unto himself. Kind of wish this was delved into a bit more.
  • Conversely, the 'Otto is responsible' endings ring a bit false because they seem too tidy and don't bring quite the same catharsis, but in both of those endings we get the nice scene of Jon saying goodbye to Sherlock which I think would have been a natural thing to include in any ending. Also, Mycroft gets off pretty easy in both these endings, but I kind of wish we got more of him here, because the more we learned about the past the more I felt sorry for him. He might have a ♥♥♥♥♥♥ way of expressing himself but he seems to genuinely care for his family and being the only lucid adult dealing with an unwell mother and a kid brother getting lost in his own world must have been incredibly trying.
  • Final note, can't really wrap my head around the bit in the 'Mycroft framed Otto' ending where Sherlock is paranoid and has turned into some kind of vigilante disrupting Mycroft's operations?? Not really sure how A leads to B there, lol.

Regarding Vogel: My read on him vacillated a lot throughout my playthrough from weird philosophical sparring partner/mentor, oddball eccentric, to sinister corruptive figure, but I don't see him as a full-blown villain by the end. He really does come across to me like a chaotic, impulsive, provocative figure who was drawn to Sherlock by curiosity to see the kid who got his brother arrested for murder and hung around because it was fun to push his buttons. I don't really think he was deliberately manipulating Sherlock for any sinister end, just constantly pushing him to question his black-and-white worldview and seeing how far he could get Sherlock to bend. All that said, the overall vibe I got from him was what a creep, even occasionally leaning into predatory vibes in some scenes.
^This.

Vogel is in part what a psychologist might do, or not.. :) In the end (I also chose your first, in case that matters) he has one quote that stuck in my head. "I took your Sisyphos and made you Ozymandias" followed by "what remains now is if you let yourself be dominated by that or not" (or something similar), "I will now return to another "work"". So essentially what he does is to pull up a mirror, and let Sherlock decide the outcome.

In the case before that, regardless of what you choose (at least in the hang them endings (tested)) he will always tell Sherlock, that he is a trainwreck that will crash, because of internal contradiction, and that he cant wait for it. Thats on the question if a person has free will. To which the intelligent mans answer is no, btw. Not only because of personal and family ties (which Vogel mentions afair), but also because of "ethics programming". On which Vogel then says in one response, that morals and ethics is what happens post facto, and doesnt guide decisions. Never quite heard that school of thought, but its interesting. :)
(Devs should name philosophers.. ;) )

In the gallery case he responds to the question "what theme does the exhibition have" with "it has none - its your interpretation" also in all cases afair. So Rorschach test esentially. But this could be overinterpretation.

In the Eyes wide shut case, he encourages Sherlock to drink and have fun, which any normal person would do (open to interpretation..;) ) which my canonical Sherlock of course refused. :) When you then dont pick the "i want to analyze the champagne" option, you get a response "that that is progress". Again, hinting at a pattern, that could benefit from being interrupted. (I didnt try the other dialogue options in that case.)
Love this analysis! Just wanted to add that Vogel isn't just offering champagne, he's offering a "7% solution of... well that would be telling" – i.e. a nod to The Sign of the Four, where he injects a 7% cocaine solution.
Last edited by nshady; Dec 20, 2021 @ 7:11pm
RRevy Jan 2, 2023 @ 1:36pm 
*It is a ONE HUGE SPOILER, so beware* ;)

In police files of Violet Holmes' death we can read, that her face was swollen and in red spots - this CANNOT be from drowning. She would have to lie under the water quite some time to get such a swollen look - which means, that Sherlock would have drown by that time, because he lost his conscious while being under water. Drowning also doesn't make skin red.

"Swollen skin with red petechiae" - this sounds like ANAPHYLAXIS RASH which is a symptome of anaphylactic shock. Could she get such a shock after well-known but overdosed drug (potassium bromide) applied by Sherlock? Probably not. But what if doctor Richter gave her something NEW during argue in her room, at the day she died - he had an almost empty bottle with no label in his suitcase (he mix it by himself - it was a drug combination from mushrooms causes hallucinations). Or maybe the combination of BOTH of theese drugs caused UNEXPECTED ALLERGIC REACTION?

So I saw it like this:

1. Violet Holmes is acting hysteric, argue with doctor Richter - he probably reminded her of her husband's death, as he planned to do often, plus - he gave her the new medicine from the suitcase.
2. Sherlock puts potassium bromide tranquilizer (probably a lot) to the tea, while Mrs Holmes and doctor still argue (according to his memoir).
3. Mrs Holmes drinks the tea - probably in the garden, where she went after the argue (the tea set is left in the garden).
4. Somwhere meanwhile, Sherlock is in the cabinet of curiosities where he hears from Mycroft that the doctor did something horrible to their mother (according to his memoir).
5. Sherlock goes to check on his mother and takes her for a ride around the pond - she seems very calm at the begining, so she probably drank that tea with the tranquilizer.
6. At the father's tree - Sherlock is sayin that father had passed away and Mrs Holmes gets angry as always when disagree (note about that can be found in Otto Richter's observations of her). Beeing delusional, she beats Sherlock - also - her reaction could've been strenghten by the new drug (hallucinogenic mushrooms), and she pulls him to the pond, threatening to kill.
7. She's drowning Sherlock, and somewhere meanwhile the anaphylactic shock is on (after the new drug from the suitcase or overdosed tranqulizer or both).
8. Sherlock looses his consciousnes under the water.
9. Violet finaly loses her consciousness too, due to anaphylactic shock and probably overdosed tranqillizer, then goes hypoxia (hypoxia is the main cause of death).
10. Doctor Richter gets on place - he probably heared the screams.
11. He grabs Sherlock and - maybe - also Violet out of the water.
12. The boy is alive, but Violet doesn't breathe.
13. He's trying to do tracheothomy but he fails (he might be in shock after what happened with his patient after the new drug, or he is just a very lousy doctor).
14. Mycroft appears.

So... if it goes about responsibility, I would say it lays completely at doctor's shoulders. But I think Sherlock would blame himself basing on evidences and memories - and so did I. Whether is Jon or Sherlock, as they are one man, I guess is up to everyone in person. The most important, I think, is that with the death or leave of Jon, some part of Sherlock is dying once and forever (probably the one responsible for deeper feelings and so on..)
As it's been said at the end - Sherlock was just a fragile child trying to help his sick mother who abused him, probably causing a lot of his future problems, but only the doctor Richter's bad actions are the main cause of what happened.

About Vogel:
Throughout the game, as a Sherlock, I let go some of the criminals I caught, because of many different circumstances and the fact, that the guilty was often also a victim.

But when it comes to me as Sherlock, I accused myself of murdering my own mother without any special treatment, when these special treatment where absolutely aquired in here. Without a doubt, Sherlock was a victim in his own case, but he refused this to himself.

And, I think, here comes the Vogel, a person we can blame for our changing mood. He was always trying to undermine our decisions, to make us stop thinking only about the truth and morality. But in the end, when our soft side called "Jon" is gone, we kind of understood that and stand for truth again. "The truth is the truth". No matter what.[

Other thoughts:
- Mrs Holmes may be used to these potassium bromide tranquilizer, in a way that they doesn't work any more on her, but she can of course still overdose them;

- Even if Mycroft goes with everything that Sherlock deduce in all 4 endings, I'm pretty sure that Mycroft would lie (or is lying) to him after hearing that his brother deduction got wrong and Sherlock blamed doctor Ritter instead of himself;

- Mycroft would have accused Richter anyway no matter if he had to save his younger brother or not - Richter's experimental treatment doesn't work and he continues it, which drive Mrs Holmes to delusions and murder atempt, so the doctor's fault is clear - for using a method of treatment that causes or increases the harm;

- There is a note from the judge in charge of Mrs Holmes' death case which suggests, that Mycroft helped him with some personal issue, so he was probably doing everything he could to win in court and blame Ritter as the ONLY responsible for mother's death;

- If it is actually Richter guilt or accident (he killed Violet, whitout Sherlock involvment), I think Mycroft would still like to protect Sherlock from the bad memory of his mother who beat him more than once and even tried to murder him, because that sounds like enough trauma to last a life time.
Last edited by RRevy; Jan 2, 2023 @ 1:53pm
HerculeHolmes Feb 27, 2023 @ 10:16pm 
Originally posted by fleur_de_mis:
Originally posted by Mirus:
Watson had been at war for a few years and was wounded and got shellshocked by the time he met Holmes, who had barely left England until then. Though Holmes wasn't as much a cherub as he's depicted in here, it stands to reason that Watson looks a bit more haggard or at least aged.

As a side note, the Holmes & Watson introduction scene adapted from A Study in Scarlet was one of my favorite scenes in the game, really liked how the direction and acting drove home the sad reality behind the pithy, very English Victorian dialogue ("Nice to meet you, I have depressive episodes" "Oh that's cool, I have PTSD"). Watson in particular was animated/acted with a quiet, nervous, muted energy that effectively conveyed "just got back from a horrible war" lol.

That said they could have at least put a lab coat (maybe the Scatterbrained Scientist outfit lol) on Sherlock; dude's probably getting blood and chemicals all over his super fancy waistcoat.

How the way Sherlock says "John?" at the very end can subtly differ depending on which ending you go with. It's little touches like that that I appreciate in a game.
< >
Showing 1-14 of 14 comments
Per page: 1530 50