Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Honestly, it doesn't surprise me since a lot of games(even AAA games) seem like that nowadays when they are first released. It does not seem to be the case that the game is a buggy mess like games like cyberpunk was when it got released. I have not seen anyone complain about the combat being bad. Only some complaining about how the main character can't fight in the battle.
UI is too hard to playable
rpg´s. I am sure with a few patches it will become a good game, some ratings at magazines from my country are very solid and praise the tactical depth, difficult and long playtime.
Most people want to play new Kings Bounty but they were deceived and very disapointed its not they want to play.
But why other people who bought the game are praising it? Are they playing a different version of the game?